Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 31 Issue 01

View Issue TOC
Volume 31, No. 1
Pages 80 - 89

OpenAccess

Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Physical and Biological Properties along the Endurance Array of the California Current Ecosystem

By Fernanda Henderikx Freitas, Gonzalo S. Saldías, Miguel Goñi, R. Kipp Shearman, and Angelicque E. White  
Jump to
Article Abstract Citation References Copyright & Usage
Article Abstract

The coastal margin of the Pacific Northwest of the United States is a highly dynamic and productive region. Here, we use satellite, high-frequency mooring, and glider estimates of biologically relevant physical and optical variables to characterize seasonal patterns and latitudinal and cross-shore gradients in particle concentrations between the Washington and Oregon shelves. Consistent with prior research, we find that the Columbia River exerts a strong seasonal influence on the Washington shelf, but smaller coastal rivers and resuspension processes also appear important in determining particle distributions nearshore during winter across the full study region. We find fluorescence-based measurements of chlorophyll to be similar in magnitude across the two shelves over the time period examined, although the much weaker wind stresses off Washington indicate that processes other than upwelling are important determinants of chlorophyll changes in those areas, as previously suggested. These in situ observations contrast with the overall differences observed from satellite data, which consistently show higher chlorophyll concentrations off the Washington coast. This research suggests that latitudinal differences in chromophoric dissolved organic matter may be a partial explanation for perceived trends in satellite-derived chlorophyll. The observations presented are nascent; maturation of temporal and spatial coverage of OOI data sets will be necessary to more conclusively link physical forcing and biogeochemical responses.

Citation

Henderikx Freitas, F., G.S. Saldías, M. Goñi, R.K. Shearman, and A.E. White. 2018. Temporal and spatial dynamics of physical and biological properties along the Endurance Array of the California Current ecosystem. Oceanography 31(1):80–89, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2018.113.

References
    Austin, J.A., and J.A. Barth. 2002. Variation in the position of the upwelling front on the Oregon shelf. Journal of Geophysical Research 107(C11), 3180, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC000858.
  1. Barnes, C.A., A.C. Duxbury, and B. Morse. 1972. Circulation and selected properties of the Columbia River effluent at sea. Pp. 71–80 in The Columbia River Estuary and Adjacent Ocean Waters: Bioenvironmental Studies. A.T. Pruter and D.L. Alveison, eds, University of Washington Press, Seattle.
  2. Brody, S.R., M.S. Lozier, and J.P. Dunne. 2013. A comparison of methods to determine phytoplankton bloom initiation. Journal of Geophysical Research 118(5):2,345–2,357, https://doi.org/​10.1002/jgrc.20167.
  3. Coble, P.G. 1996. Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry 51(4):325–346, https://doi.org/​10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3.
  4. Cullen, J.J. 1982. The deep chlorophyll maximum: Comparing vertical profiles of chlorophyll a. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 39:791–803, https://doi.org/10.1139/f82-108.
  5. Davis, K.A., N.S. Banas, S.N. Giddings, S.A. Siedlecki, P. MacCready, E.J. Lessard, R.M. Kudela, and B.M. Hickey. 2014. Estuary-enhanced upwelling of marine nutrients fuels coastal productivity in the US Pacific Northwest. Journal of Geophysical Research 119:8,778–8,799, https://doi.org/​10.1002/​2014JC010248.
  6. Dickson, M., and P.A. Wheeler. 1995. Nitrate uptake rates in a coastal upwelling regime: A comparison of PN-specific, absolute, and Chl a-specific rates. Limnology and Oceanography 40, https://doi.org/​10.4319/lo.1995.40.3.0533.
  7. Dierssen, H.M. 2010. Perspectives on empirical approaches for ocean color remote sensing of chlorophyll in a changing climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107:17,073–17,078, https://doi.org/​10.1073/pnas.0913800107.
  8. Drake, D.E., and D.A. Cacchione. 1985. Seasonal variation in sediment transport on the Russian River Shelf, California. Continental Shelf Research 4:495–514, https://doi.org/​10.1016/0278-4343(85)90007-X.
  9. Goñi, M.A., J.A. Hatten, R.A. Wheatcroft, and J.C. Borgeld. 2013. Particulate organic matter export by two contrasting small mountainous rivers from the Pacific Northwest, USA. Journal of Geophysical Research 118:112–134, https://doi.org/​10.1002/jgrg.20024.
  10. Gordon, H.R. 1997. Atmospheric correction of ocean color imagery in the Earth Observing System era. Journal of Geophysical Research 102(D14):17,081–17,106, https://doi.org/​10.1029/96JD02443.
  11. Henderikx Freitas, F., D.A. Siegel, S. Maritorena, and E. Fields. 2017. Satellite assessment of particulate matter and phytoplankton variations in the Santa Barbara Channel and its surrounding waters: Role of surface waves. Journal of Geophysical Research 122:355–371, https://doi.org/​10.1002/​2016JC012152.
  12. Henderikx Freitas, F., D.A. Siegel, L. Washburn, S. Halewood, and E. Stassinos. 2016. Assessing controls on cross-shelf phytoplankton and suspended particle distributions using repeated bio-optical glider surveys. Journal of Geophysical Research 121:7,776–7,794, https://doi.org/​10.1002/2016JC011781.
  13. Hickey, B.M., and N.S. Banas. 2003. Oceanography of the US Pacific Northwest coastal ocean and estuaries with application to coastal ecology. Estuaries 26(4):1,010–1,031, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803360.
  14. Hickey, B.M., and N.S. Banas. 2008. Why is the northern end of the California Current System so productive? Oceanography 21(4):90–107, https://doi.org/​10.5670/oceanog.2008.07.
  15. Hickey, B.M., S. Geier, N. Kachel, and A. Macfadyen. 2005. A bi-directional river plume: The Columbia in summer. Continental Shelf Research 25:1,631–1,656, https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.csr.2005.04.010.
  16. Hickey, B.M., L.J. Pietrafesa, D.A. Jay, and W.C. Boicourt. 1998. The Columbia River plume study: Subtidal variability in the velocity and salinity fields. Journal of Geophysical Research 103(C5):10,339–10,368, https://doi.org/​10.1029/97JC03290.
  17. Huyer, A. 1983. Coastal upwelling in the California Current system. Progress in Oceanography 12(3):259–284, https://doi.org/​10.1016/0079-6611(83)90010-1.
  18. Jonasz, M., and G. Fournier. 2011. Light Scattering by Particles in Water: Theoretical and Experimental Foundations. Academic Press, 704 pp.
  19. Kniskern, T.A., J.A. Warrick, K.L. Farnsworth, R.A. Wheatcroft, and M.A Goñi. 2011. Coherence of river and ocean conditions along the US West Coast during storms. Continental Shelf Research 31(7):789–805, https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.csr.2011.01.012.
  20. Maritorena, S., D.A. Siegel, and A.R. Peterson. 2002. Optimization of a semianalytical ocean color model for global-scale applications. Applied Optics 41(15):2,705–2,714, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.002705.
  21. McKibben, S.M. 2016. Above and Below: Oregon Coastal Phytoplankton Bloom Dynamics from Sea and Space. PhD Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
  22. McQuatters-Gollop, A., L.D. Mee, D.E. Raitsos, and G.I. Shapiro. 2008. Non-linearities, regime shifts and recovery: The recent influence of climate on Black Sea chlorophyll. Journal of Marine Systems 74(1):649–658, https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.jmarsys.2008.06.002.
  23. Müller, P., X.-P. Li, and K.K. Niyogi. 2001. Non-photochemical quenching: A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiology 125(4):1,558–1,566, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.4.1558.
  24. Palacios, S.L., T.D. Peterson, and R.M. Kudela. 2009. Development of synthetic salinity from remote sensing for the Columbia River plume. Journal of Geophysical Research 114, C00B05, https://doi.org/​10.1029/2008JC004895
  25. Palacios, S.L., T.D. Peterson, and R.M. Kudela. 2012. Optical characterization of water masses within the Columbia River plume. Journal of Geophysical Research 117, C11020, https://doi.org/​10.1029/2012JC008005.
  26. Pak, H., G.F. Beardsley Jr., and P.K. Park. 1970. The Columbia River as a source of marine light-scattering particles. Journal of Geophysical Research 75(24):4,570–4,578, https://doi.org/​10.1029/JC075i024p04570
  27. Saldías, G.S., R.K. Shearman, J.A. Barth, and N. Tufillaro. 2016. Optics of the offshore Columbia River plume from glider observations and satellite imagery. Journal of Geophysical Research 121:2,367–2,384, https://doi.org/​10.1002/2015JC011431.
  28. Schmechtig, C., H. Claustre, A. Poteau, and F. D’Ortenzio. 2014. Bio-Argo Quality Control Manual for the Chlorophyll-A Concentration, Version 1.0. Ifremer, 16 pp., https://doi.org/​10.13155/35385.
  29. Smith, L.M., J.A. Barth, D.S. Kelley, A. Plueddemann, I. Rodero, G.A. Ulses, M.F. Vardaro, and R. Weller. 2018. The Ocean Observatories Initiative. Oceanography 31(1):16–35, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2018.105.
  30. Sullivan, J.M. 2013. Measuring optical backscattering in water. Pp. 189–224 in Light Scattering Reviews 7: Radiative Transfer and Optical Properties of Atmosphere and Underlying Surface. J.M. Sullivan, M.S. Twardowski, J.R.V. Zaneveld, C.C. Moore, and A. Kokhanovsky, eds, Praxis Publishing Ltd.
  31. Thomas, A.C., and R.A. Weatherbee. 2006. Satellite-measured temporal variability of the Columbia River plume. Remote Sensing of Environment 100:167–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.rse.2005.10.018.
  32. Ware, D.M., and R.E. Thomson. 2005. Bottom-up ecosystem trophic dynamics determine fish production in the Northeast Pacific. Science 308(5726):1,280–1,284, https://doi.org/​10.1126/science.1109049.
  33. Warner, M.D., C.F. Mass, and E.P. Salathé. 2012. Wintertime extreme precipitation events along the Pacific Northwest coast: Climatology and synoptic evolution. Monthly Weather Review 140:2,021–2,043, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00197.1.
  34. Wetz, M.S., and P.A. Wheeler. 2003. Production and partitioning of organic matter during simulated phytoplankton blooms. Limnology and Oceanography 5, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.1808.
  35. Wheatcroft, R.A., M.A. Goñi, J.A. Hatten, G.B. Pasternack, and J.A. Warrick. 2010. The role of effective discharge in the ocean delivery of particulate organic carbon by small, mountainous river systems. Limnology and Oceanography 55:161–171, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0161.
  36. Zhang, X., L. Hu, and M.-X. He. 2009. Scattering by pure seawater: Effect of salinity. Optics Express 17(7):5,698–5,710, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.005698.
Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.