Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 24 Issue 03

View Issue TOC
Volume 24, No. 3
Pages 102 - 113

OpenAccess

Recent Advances in Arctic Ocean Studies Employing Models from the Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project

By Andrey Proshutinsky , Yevgeny Aksenov , Jaclyn Clement Kinney , Rüdiger Gerdes , Elena Golubeva, David Holland , Greg Holloway , Alexandra Jahn , Mark Johnson , Ekaterina Popova, Mike Steele, and Eiji Watanabe  
Jump to
Article Abstract Citation References Copyright & Usage
Article Abstract

Observational data show that the Arctic Ocean has significantly and rapidly changed over the last few decades, which is unprecedented in the observational record. Air and water temperatures have increased, sea ice volume and extent have decreased, permafrost has thawed, storminess has increased, sea level has risen, coastal erosion has progressed, and biological processes have become more complex and diverse. In addition, there are socio-economic impacts of Arctic environmental change on Arctic residents and the world, associated with tourism, oil and gas exploration, navigation, military operations, trade, and industry. This paper discusses important results of the Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project, which is advancing the role of numerical modeling in Arctic Ocean and sea ice research by stimulating national and international synergies for high-latitude research.

Citation

Proshutinsky, A., Y. Aksenov, J. Clement Kinney, R. Gerdes, E. Golubeva, D. Holland, G. Holloway, A. Jahn, M. Johnson, E. Popova, M. Steele, and E. Watanabe. 2011. Recent advances in Arctic ocean studies employing models from the Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project. Oceanography 24(3):102–113, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2011.61.

References
    Aagaard, K., and E.C. Carmack. 1989. The role of sea ice and other fresh water in the Arctic circulation. Journal of Geophysical Research 94:14,485–14,498, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC094iC10p14485.
  1. Arctic Climatology Project. 1997. Environmental Working Group Joint U.S.-Russian Atlas of the Arctic Ocean: Winter Period. L. Timokhov and F. Tanis, eds, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, in association with the National Snow and Ice Data Center. CD-ROM.
  2. Arctic Climatology Project. 1998. Environmental Working Group Joint U.S.-Russian Atlas of the Arctic Ocean: Winter Period. L. Timokhov and F. Tanis, eds, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, in association with the National Snow and Ice Data Center. CD-ROM.
  3. Bleck, R., and D.B. Boudra. 1981. Initial testing of a numerical ocean circulation model using a hybrid (quasi-isopycnal) vertical coordinate. Journal of Physical Oceanography 11:755-770, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1981)011<0755:ITOANO>2.0.CO;2.
  4. Blumberg, A.F., and G.L. Mellor. 1987. A description of a three-dimensional coastal ocean circulation model. Pp. 1–16 in Three-Dimensional Coastal Ocean Models. N.S. Heaps, ed., American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.
  5. Bryan, K.H. 1969. A numerical method for study of the circulation of the world ocean. Journal of Computational Physics 4:347–376, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(69)90004-7.
  6. Budikova, D. 2009. Role of Arctic sea ice in global atmospheric circulation: A review. Global and Planetary Change 68:149–163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.04.001.
  7. Carmack, E., D. Barber, J. H. Christensen, R. Macdonald, B. Rudels, and E. Sakshaug. 2006. Climate variability and physical forcing of the food webs and the carbon budget on panarctic shelves. Progress in Oceanography 72:145–181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.10.005.
  8. Chapman, W.L., and J.E. Walsh. 2007. Simulations of Arctic temperature and pressure by global coupled models. Journal of Climate 20:609–632, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4026.1.
  9. Chen, C., G. Gao, J. Qi, A. Proshutinsky, R.C. Beardsley, Z. Kowalik, H. Lin, and G. Cowles. 2009. A new high-resolution unstructured-grid finite-volume Arctic Ocean model (AO-FVCOM): An application for tidal studies. Journal of Geophysical Research 114, C08017, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004941.
  10. Coachman, L.K., and K. Aagaard. 1966. On the water exchange through Bering Strait. Limnology and Oceanography 11:44–59, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1966.11.1.0044.
  11. Fieg, K., R. Gerdes, E. Fahrbach, A. Beszczynska-Möller, and U. Schauer. 2010. Simulation of oceanic volume transports through Fram Strait 1995–2005. Ocean Dynamics 12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-010-0263-9.
  12. Gerdes, R., and C. Köberle. 2007. Comparison of Arctic sea ice thickness variability in IPCC Climate of the 20th century experiments and in ocean-sea ice hindcasts. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, C04S13, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003616.
  13. Golubeva, E.N., and G.A. Platov. 2007. On improving the simulation of Atlantic Water circulation in the Arctic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, C04S05, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003734.
  14. Holland, M.M., M.C. Serreze, and J. Stroeve. 2010. The sea ice mass budget of the Arctic and its future change as simulated by coupled climate models. Climate Dynamics 34:185–200, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0493-4.
  15. Holloway, G. 2009. Entropic forces in geophysical fluid dynamics. Entropy 11:360–383, https://doi.org/10.3390/e11030360.
  16. Holloway, G., and A. Proshutinsky. 2007. Role of tides in Arctic ocean/ice climate. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, C04S06, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003643.
  17. Holloway, G., F. Dupont, E. Golubeva, S. Hakkinen, E. Hunke, M. Jin, M. Karcher, F. Kauker, M. Maltrud, M.A. Morales Maqueda, and others. 2007. Water properties and circulation in Arctic Ocean models. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, C04S03, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003642.
  18. Holloway, G., and Z. Wang. 2009. Representing eddy stress in an Arctic Ocean model. Journal of Geophysical Research 114, C06020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC005169.
  19. Holloway, G., A. Nguyen, and Z. Wang. In press. Oceans and ocean models as seen by current meters. Journal of Geophysical Research, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007044.
  20. Jahn, A., L.B. Tremblay, R. Newton, M.M. Holland, L.A. Mysak, and I.A. Dmitrenko. 2010. A tracer study of the Arctic Ocean’s liquid freshwater export variability. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, C07015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005873.
  21. Karcher, M., F. Kauker, R. Gerdes, E. Hunke, and J. Zhang. 2007. On the dynamics of Atlantic Water circulation in the Arctic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, C04S02, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003630.
  22. Pabi, S., G.S. van Dijken, and K.P. Arrigo. 2008. Primary production in the Arctic Ocean, 1998–2006. Journal of Geophysical Research 113, C08005, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004578.
  23. Popova, E.E., A. Yool, A.C. Coward, Y.K. Aksenov, S.G. Alderson, B.A. de Cuevas, and T.R. Anderson. 2010. Control of primary production in the Arctic by nutrients and light: Insights from a high resolution ocean general circulation model. Biogeosciences 7:3,569–3,591, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3569-2010.
  24. Proshutinsky, A., R. Krishfield, M.-L. Timmermans, J. Toole, E. Carmack, F. McLaughlin, W.J. Williams, S. Zimmermann, M. Itoh, and K. Shimada. 2009. The Beaufort Gyre freshwater reservoir: State and variability from observations. Journal of Geophysical Research 114, C00A10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC005104.
  25. Proshutinsky, A., J. Yang, R. Krishfield, R. Gerdes, M. Karcher, F. Kauker, C. Koeberle, S. Hakkinen, W. Hibler, D. Holland, and others. 2005. Arctic Ocean study: Synthesis of model results and observations. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 86(40):368, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005EO400003.
  26. Rudels, B., E.P. Jones, L.G. Anderson, and G. Kattner. 1994. On the intermediate depth waters of the Arctic Ocean. Pp. 33–46 in The Polar Oceans and Their Role in Shaping the Global Environment. O.M. Johannessen, R.D. Muench, and J.E. Overland, eds, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.
  27. Smith, W.O., and H.J. Niebauer. 1993. Interactions between biological and physical processes in Arctic seas: Investigations using numerical models. Reviews of Geophysics 31:189–209, https://doi.org/10.1029/93RG00318.
  28. Steele, M., J. Morison, W. Ermold, I. Rigor, M. Ortmeyer, and K. Shimada. 2004. Circulation of summer Pacific halocline water in the Arctic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 109, C02027, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002009.
  29. Stroeve, J., M.M. Holland, W. Meier, T. Scambos, and M. Serreze. 2007. Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast. Geophysical Research Letters 34, L09501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029703.
  30. Watanabe, E., and H. Hasumi. 2009. Pacific water transport in the western Arctic Ocean simulated by an eddy-resolving coupled sea ice-ocean model. Journal of Physical Oceanography 39:2,194–2,211, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4010.1.
  31. Yang, J. 2005. The Arctic and subarctic ocean flux of potential vorticity and the Arctic Ocean circulation. Journal of Physical Oceanography 35:2,387–2,407, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2819.1.
  32. Zhang, J., and M. Steele. 2007. Effect of vertical mixing on the Atlantic Water layer circulation in the Arctic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, C04S04, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003732.
Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.