Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 26 Issue 03

View Issue TOC
Volume 26, No. 3
Pages 132 - 139

OpenAccess

Patterns and Controls of Nutrient Concentrations in a Southeastern United States Tidal Creek

By Charles A. Schutte , Kimberley Hunter , Paul McKay, Daniela Di Iorio , Samantha B. Joye , and Christof Meile  
Jump to
Article Abstract Citation References Copyright & Usage
Article Abstract

Terrestrial inputs largely govern nutrient delivery to the coastal ocean, and subsequent processes transform these nutrients in the land-ocean transition zone. Here, we describe spatial and temporal patterns in surface water chemistry from the Duplin, a salt marsh/tidal creek system located in coastal Georgia, USA. Key drivers of nutrient concentration patterns in the Duplin include discharge from the nearby Altamaha River, groundwater inputs, exchange with the marsh platform, and biological processes within the tidal creek. Altamaha River discharge is correlated with salinity in the Duplin, but the processes taking place within the Duplin watershed regulate the distribution of other dissolved and particulate materials. Long-term data sets advance our understanding of the relative importance of these processes in generating the observed patterns in surface water chemistry. This knowledge improves our ability to predict how coastal systems will respond to anthropogenic perturbations.

Citation

Schutte, C.A., K. Hunter, P. McKay, D. Di Iorio, S.B. Joye, and C. Meile. 2013. Patterns and controls of nutrient concentrations in a southeastern United States tidal creek. Oceanography 26(3):132–139, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2013.55.

References
    Boon, J.D. 1975. Tidal discharge asymmetry in a salt-marsh drainage system. Limnology and Oceanography 20(1):71–80.
  1. Caffrey, J.M., N. Bano, K. Kalanetra, and J.T. Hollibaugh. 2007. Ammonia oxidation and ammonia-oxidizing Bacteria and Archaea populations from estuaries with differing histories of hypoxia. ISME Journal 1:660–662, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.79.
  2. Chalmers, A.G., R.G. Wiegert, and P.L. Wolf. 1985. Carbon balance in a salt marsh: Interactions of diffusive export, tidal deposition and rainfall-caused erosion. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 21(6):757–771, https://doi.org/​10.1016/0272-7714(85)90071-X.
  3. Cherry, J.A., K.L. McKee, and J.B. Grace. 2009. Elevated CO2 enhances biological contributions to elevation change in coastal wetlands by offsetting stressors associated with sea-level rise. Journal of Ecology 97:67–77, https://doi.org/​10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01449.x.
  4. Childers, D.L. 1994. Fifteen years of marsh flumes: A review of marsh-water column interactions in southeastern USA estuaries. Pp. 277–293 in Global Wetlands: Old World and New. W.J. Mitsch, ed., Elsevier Science.
  5. Childers, D.L., J.W. Day Jr., and H.N. McKellar Jr. 2000. Twenty more years of marsh and estuarine flux studies: Revisiting Nixon (1980). Pp. 391–424 in Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, eds, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, https://doi.org/​10.1007/0-306-47534-0_18.
  6. Dame, R.F. 1989. The importance of Spartina alterniflora to Atlantic coast estuaries. Reviews in Aquatic Sciences 1:639–660.
  7. Di Iorio, D., and R.M. Castelao. 2013. The dynamical response of salinity to freshwater discharge and wind forcing in adjacent estuaries on the Georgia coast. Oceanography 26(3):44–51, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2013.44.
  8. Drewry, J.J., L.T.H. Newham, and B.F.W. Croke. 2009. Suspended sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and exports during storm-events in the Tuross estuary, Australia. Journal of Environmental Management 90(2):879–887, https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.004.
  9. Hladik, C., and M. Alber. 2012. Accuracy assessment and correction of a LIDAR-derived salt marsh digital elevation model. Remote Sensing of Environment 121:224–235, https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.018.
  10. Hollibaugh, J.T., S. Gifford, S. Sharma, N. Bano, and M.A. Moran. 2011. Metatranscriptomic analysis of ammonia-oxidizing organisms in an estuarine bacterioplankton assemblage. ISME Journal 5(5):866–878, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.172.
  11. Howarth, R.W. 1988. Nutrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:89–110, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.​000513.
  12. Howarth, R.W. 2008. Coastal nitrogen pollution: A review of sources and trends globally and regionally. Harmful Algae 8(1):14–20.
  13. Imberger, J., T. Berman, R.R. Christian, E.B. Sherr, D.E. Whitney, L.R. Pomeroy, R.G. Wiegert, and W.J. Wiebe. 1983. The influence of water motion on the distribution and transport of materials in a salt-marsh estuary. Limnology and Oceanography 28(2):201–214.
  14. Joye, S.B., K. Hunter, N. Weston, B. Porubsky, M. Erickson, and S. Bell. 2009. Long-term water quality monitoring in the Altamaha, Doboy and Sapelo sounds and the Duplin River near Sapelo Island, Georgia from May 2001 to August 2009. Available online at: http://gce-lter.marsci.uga.edu/public/app/dataset_details.asp?accession=NUT-GCEM-0909a (accessed July 5, 2013).
  15. Krest, J.M., W.S. Moore, L.R. Gardner, and J.T. Morris. 2000. Marsh nutrient export supplied by groundwater discharge: Evidence from radium measurements. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14(1):167–176, https://doi.org/10.1029/​1999GB001197.
  16. Levin, L.A., D.F. Boesch, A. Covich, C. Dahm, C. Erseus, K.C. Ewel, R.T. Kneib, A. Moldenke, M.A. Palmer, P. Snelgrove, and others. 2001. The function of marine critical transition zones and the importance of sediment biodiversity. Ecosystems 4(5):430–451, https://doi.org/​10.1007/s10021-001-0021-4.
  17. Mallin, M.A., D.C. Parson, V.L. Johnson, M.R. McIver, and H.A. CoVan. 2004. Nutrient limitation and algal blooms in urbanizing tidal creeks. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 298(2):211–231, https://doi.org/​10.1016/S0022-0981(03)00360-5.
  18. McKay, P., and D. Di Iorio. 2008. Heat budget for a shallow, sinuous salt marsh estuary. Continental Shelf Research 28:1,740–1,753, https://doi.org/​10.1016/j.csr.2008.04.008.
  19. Moore, W.S., J.O. Blanton, and S.B. Joye. 2006. Estimates of flushing times, submarine groundwater discharge, and nutrient fluxes to Okatee Estuary, South Carolina. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, C09006, https://doi.org/​10.1029/2005JC003041.
  20. Nelson, J.L., and E.S. Zavaleta. 2012. Salt marsh as a coastal filter for the oceans: Changes in function with experimental increases in nitrogen loading and sea-level rise. PLoS ONE 7(8):e38558, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.​0038558.
  21. Nixon, S.W. 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia 41:199–219.
  22. Nixon, S.W., J.W. Ammerman, L.P. Atkinson, V.M. Berounsky, G. Billen, W.C. Boicourt, W.R. Boynton, T.M. Church, D.M. Ditoro, and R. Elmgren. 1996. The fate of nitrogen and phosphorus at the land-sea margin of the North Atlantic Ocean. Biogeochemistry 35:141–180, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02179826.
  23. Odum, E.P. 1968. A research challenge: Evaluating the productivity of coastal and estuarine water. Pp. 63–64 in Proceedings of the Second Sea Grant Conference, October 17–18, 1968. University of Rhode Island, Newport, RI, USA.
  24. Porubsky, W.P. 2008. Nutrient-replete benthic microalgae as a source of dissolved organic carbon to coastal waters. Estuaries and Coasts 31(5):860–876, https://doi.org/​10.1007/s12237-008-9077-0.
  25. Ragotzkie, R.A., and R.A. Bryson. 1955. Hydrography of the Duplin River, Sapelo Island, Georgia. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean 5(4):297–314.
  26. Small, C., and R.J. Nicholls. 2003. A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. Journal of Coastal Research 19(3):584–599.
  27. Stumpf, R.P. 1983. The process of sedimentation on the surface of a salt marsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 17(5):495–508, https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(83)90002-1.
  28. Thorensen, M., 2004. Temporal and spatial variation in seston available to oysters and the contribution of benthic diatoms to their diet in the Duplin River, Georgia. PhD Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
  29. United States Geological Survey. 2013. Available online at: http://waterdata.usgs.gov/ga/nwis/nwisman/?site_no=02226000&agency_cd=USGS (accessed July 5, 2013).
  30. Viso, R.F., J. Marshall, J. Phillips, S. Okano, L. Harmon, and R. Cash. 2011. Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the Duplin River and adjacent intertidal areas near Sapelo Island, Georgia. Available online at: http://gce-lter.marsci.uga.edu/public/app/dataset_details.asp?accession=GIS-GCED-1104 (accessed July 5, 2013).
  31. Vörösmarty, C.J., and T.C. Loder. 1994. Spring neap tidal contrasts and nutrient dynamics in a marsh-dominated estuary. Estuaries 17(3):537–551, https://doi.org/​10.2307/1352402.
  32. Weston, N.B., J.T. Hollibaugh, and S.B. Joye. 2009. Population growth away from the coastal zone: Thirty years of land use change and nutrient export in the Altamaha River, GA. Science of the Total Environment 407(10):3,347–2,256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.12.066.
  33. Weston, N.B., W.P. Porubsky, V.A. Samarkin, M. Erickson, S.E. Macavoy, and S.B. Joye. 2006. Porewater stoichiometry of terminal metabolic products, sulfate, and dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in estuarine intertidal creek-bank sediments. Biogeochemistry 77(3):375–408, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-005-1640-1.
  34. Wiegert, R.G., and B.J. Freeman. 1990. Tidal Salt Marshes of the Southeast Atlantic Coast: A Community Profile. Biological Report 85(7.29), US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 70 pp. Available online at: http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/techrpt/85-7-29.pdf (accessed July 10, 2013)
  35. Wilson, A.M., and J.T. Morris. 2012. The influence of tidal forcing on groundwater flow and nutrient exchange in a salt marsh-dominated estuary. Biogeochemistry 108:27–38, https://doi.org/​10.1007/s10533-010-9570-y.
Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.