The population of beluga whales in Cook Inlet, Alaska, is in decline, and since 2000 these whales have been under consideration for designation as “endangered” under the Endangered Species Act (and were placed on the list in October 2008, just before this article went to press). In order to study environmental and hydrodynamic impacts on the belugas’ movements and survival in the unique habitat of the inlet, a three-dimensional ocean circulation and inundation model is combined with satellite-tracked beluga whale data. Model-whale data comparisons from two whale paths during a five-day period (September 17–21, 2000) covering 10 tidal cycles suggest that daily movements of belugas in the upper Cook Inlet follow propagation of the tides. Both whales took advantage of the twice-daily flood of mudflats by the very large tides (8–10 m range) to swim toward river mouths in shallow regions that are inaccessible during low tide. A significant correlation was found between whale locations and the model sea level. In the Knik Arm, north of Anchorage, ebbing and flooding rates are predictable, and the tracked whale followed the water velocity in direction and speed. However, in the Turnagain Arm, south of Anchorage, where a large change in topography along the arm causes nonlinear flooding and ebbing (including strong tidal bore currents with speeds up to 5 m s-1), the movement of the tracked whale was correlated only with the water level, not with the currents. The encouraging results from this study demonstrate the usefulness of the numerical model to help understand the belugas’ behavior and will be followed by a more detailed study using a larger tracking data set and longer simulations. Such a study will help to evaluate potential impacts of future changes such as shoreline development, which may change flood regions and the belugas’ accessibility to their feeding areas.

Ezer, T., R. Hobbs, and L.-Y. Oey. 2008. On the movement of beluga whales in Cook Inlet, Alaska: Simulations of tidal and environmental impacts using a hydrodynamic inundation model. Oceanography 21(4):186–195, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2008.17.

Hobbs, R.C., D.J. Rugh, and D.P. DeMaster. 2000. Abundance of beluga whales in Cook Inlet, Alaska, 1994–2000. Marine Fisheries Review 62:37–45.
1. Hobbs, R.C., K.L. Laidre, D.J. Vos, B.A. Mahoney, and M. Eagleton. 2005. Movements and area of use of belugas, Delphinapterus leucas, in a subarctic Alaskan estuary. Arctic 58:331–340.
2. Hobbs, R.C., K.E.W. Shelden, D.J. Rugh, and S.A. Norman. 2008. 2008 status review and extinction risk assessment of Cook Inlet belugas (Delphinapterus leucas). Alaska Fisheries Science Center Report 2008-02, NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, 116 pp.
3. Oey L.-Y. 2005. A wetting and drying scheme for POM. Ocean Modelling 9:133–150.
4. Oey L.-Y. 2006. An OGCM with movable land-sea boundaries. Ocean Modelling 13:176–195.
5. Oey, L.-Y., T. Ezer, C. Hu, and F. Muller-Karger. 2007. Baroclinic tidal flows and inundation processes in Cook Inlet, Alaska: Numerical modeling and satellite observations. Ocean Dynamics 57:205–221.
6. Rugh, D.J., K.E.W. Shelden, and B.A. Mahoney. 2000. Distribution of belugas, Delphinapterus leucas, in Cook Inlet, Alaska, during June/July, 1993–2000. Marine Fisheries Review 62(3):6–21.
7. Rugh, D.J., B.A. Mahoney, and B.K. Smith. 2004. Aerial surveys of beluga whales in Cook Inlet, Alaska, between June 2001 and June 2002. US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum, NMFS-AFSC-145.
8. Rugh, D.J., K.E.W. Shelden, C.L. Sims, B.A. Mahoney, B.K. Smith, L.K. Litzky, and R.C. Hobbs. 2005. Aerial surveys of belugas in Cook Inlet, Alaska, June 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004. US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum, NMFS-AFSC-149.

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.