Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 27 Issue 03

View Issue TOC
Volume 27, No. 3
Pages 80 - 91

OpenAccess

Navy Nearshore Ocean Prediction Systems

Jayaram Veeramony Mark D. OrzechKacey L. EdwardsMichael Gilligan Jeikook ChoiEric Terrill Tony De Paolo
Article Abstract

Knowledge of the nearshore ocean environment is important for naval operations, including military and humanitarian applications. The models used by the US Navy for predicting waves and circulation in the coastal regions are presented here. The wave model of choice for coastal regions is the Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) model, which predicts wave energy as a function of frequency and direction. SWAN is forced by winds as well as waves at the offshore boundaries. For coastal circulation, Delft3D, composed of a number of different modules that can be coupled with each other, is presently used. Most applications for daily operational predictions use only the Delft3D-FLOW module, which predicts currents, mean water levels, temperature, and salinity. Inputs to the model include winds, tides, general ocean circulation, waves, daily river discharges, temperature, and salinity. Delft3D-FLOW is coupled with the Delft3D-WAVE module for areas where wave effects are of importance. A four-dimensional variational assimilation (4DVar) system based on SWAN, the SWANFAR system, is under development for nearshore wave predictions. It will improve wave predictions by using regional wave observations. We present several case studies that illustrate the validation and diverse applications of these models. All operational systems are run at the Naval Oceanographic Office.

Citation

Veeramony, J., M.D. Orzech, K.L. Edwards, M. Gilligan, J. Choi, E. Terrill, and T. De Paolo. 2014. Navy nearshore ocean prediction systems. Oceanography 27(3):80–91, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.70.

References

Allard, R., E. Rogers, P. Martin, T. Jensen, P. Chu, T. Campbell, J. Dykes, T. Smith, J. Choi, and U. Gravois. 2014. The US Navy coupled ocean-wave prediction system. Oceanography 27(3):92–103, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.71.

Barron, C.N., A.B. Kara, P.J. Martin, R.C. Rhodes, and L.F. Smedstad. 2006. Formulation, implementation and examination of vertical coordinate choices in the Global Navy Coastal Ocean Model (NCOM). Ocean Modelling 11:347–375, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2005.01.004.

Bennett, A. 2002. Inverse Modeling of the Ocean and Atmosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 260 pp.

Booij, N., R.C. Ris, and L.H. Holthuijsen. 1999. A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: Part 1. Model description and validation. Journal of Geophysical Research 104(C4):7,649–7,666, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC02622.

Carter, H.H., and D.W. Pritchard. 1988. Oceanography of Chesapeake Bay. Pp. 1–16 in Hydrodynamics of Estuaries: Dynamics of Partially-Mixed Estuaries, vol. 1. B. Kjerfe, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

Condon, A., and J. Veeramony. 2012. Development and validation of a coastal surge and inundation prediction system. Pp. 1–8 in Oceans 2012, https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2012.6404834.

de Boer, G.J., F. Baart, A. Bruens, T. Damsma, P. van Geer, B. Grasmeijer, K. den Heijer, and M. van Koningsveld. 2012. OpenEarth: Using Google Earth as outreach for NCK’s data. NCK-days 2012: Crossing Borders in Coastal Research, March 13–16, 2012, Enschede, The Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.3990/2.177.

Doyle, J.D. 2002. Coupled atmosphere–ocean wave simulations under high wind conditions. Monthly Weather Review 130:3,087–3,099, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<3087:CAOWSU>2.0.CO;2.

Durran, D.R. 1999. Numerical Methods for Wave Equations in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 465 pp.

Egbert, G.D., and S.Y. Erofeeva. 2002. Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 19:183–204, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0183:EIMOBO>2.0.CO;2.

Flampouris, S., J. Veeramony, M.D. Orzech, and H.E. Ngodock. 2013. Validation of a wave data assimilation system based on SWAN. Paper presented at the European Geosciences Union General Assembly, April 7–12, 2013, Vienna, Austria.

Goodrich, D.M., and A.F. Blumberg. 1991. The fortnightly mean circulation of Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science 32:451–462, https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(91)90034-9.

Guo, X., and A. Valle-Levinson. 2007. Tidal effects on estuarine circulation and outflow plume in the Chesapeake Bay. Continental Shelf Research 27:20–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2006.08.009.

Hodur, R.M. 1997. The Naval Research Laboratory’s Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS). Monthly Weather Review 125:1,414–1,430, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<1414:TNRLSC>2.0.CO;2.

Hogan, T.F., and T.E. Rosmond. 1991. The description of the US Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System’s spectral forecast models. Monthly Weather Review 119:1,786–1,815, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<1786:TDOTNO>2.0.CO;2.

Hogan, T.F., M. Liu, J.A. Ridout, M.S. Peng, T.R. Whitcomb, B.C. Ruston, C.A. Reynolds, S.D. Eckermann, J.R. Moskaitis, N.L. Baker, and others. 2014. The Navy Global Environmental Model. Oceanography 27(3):116–125, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.73.

Hope, M.E., J.J. Westerink, A.B. Kennedy, P.C. Kerr, J.C. Dietrich, C. Dawson, C.J. Bender, J.M. Smith, R.E. Jensen, M. Zijlema, and others. 2013. Hindcast and validation of Hurricane Ike (2008) waves, forerunner, and storm surge. Journal of Geophysical Research 118:4,424–4,460, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20314.

Johnson, B.H., K.W. Kim, R.E. Heath, N.N. Hseish, and H.L. Butler. 1993. Validation of three-dimensional hydrodynamic model of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 119:2–20, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:1(2).

Kara, A.B., C.N. Barron, P.J. Martin, L.F. Smedstad, and R.C. Rhodes. 2006. Validation of interannual simulations from the 1/8° global Navy Coastal Ocean Model (NCOM). Ocean Modelling 11:376–398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2005.01.003.

Kennedy, A.B., U. Gravois, B.C. Zachry, J.J. Westerink, M.E. Hope, J.C. Dietrich, M.D. Powell, A.T. Cox, R.A. Luettich, and R.G. Dean. 2011. Origin of the Hurricane Ike forerunner surge. Geophysical Research Letters 38, L08608, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047090.

Li, M., L. Zhong, and W.C. Boicourt. 2005. Simulations of Chesapeake Bay estuary: Sensitivity to turbulence mixing parameterizations and comparison with observations. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, C12004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002585.

Martin, P.J. 2000. Description of the Navy Coastal Ocean Model Version 1.0. US Naval Research Laboratory Report No. NRL/FR/7322/00/9962, 45 pp.

Mattocks, C., and C. Forbes. 2008. A real-time, event-triggered storm surge forecasting system for the state of North Carolina. Ocean Modelling 25:95–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.06.008.

Oey, L.Y. 2005. A wetting and drying scheme for POM. Ocean Modelling 9:133–150.

Oey, L.Y. 2006. An OGCM with movable land-sea boundaries. Ocean Modelling 13:176–195.

Orzech, M.D., J. Veeramony, and H. Ngodock. 2013. A variational assimilation system for nearshore wave modeling. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 30:953–970, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00097.1.

Posey, P.G., R.A. Allard, R.H. Preller and G.M. Dawson. 2008. Validation of the global relocatable tide/surge model PCTides. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic. Technology 25:755–775, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHO533.1.

Powell, M.D., L. Holthuijsen, and J. Pietrzak. 2012. Spatial variation of surface drag coefficient in tropical cyclones. Paper presented at the 30th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, April 20, 2012, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, abstract at https://ams.confex.com/ams/30Hurricane/webprogram/Paper205841.html.

Roberson, J.A., and C.T. Crowe. 1993. Engineering Fluid Mechanics. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 785 pp.

Ruessink, B.G., J.R. Miles, F. Feddersen, R.T. Guza, and S. Elgar. 2001. Modeling the alongshore current on barred beaches. Journal of Geophysical Research 106:451–463, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000766.

Sampson, C.R., and A.J. Schrader. 2000. The Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System (Version 3.2). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 81:1,231–1,240, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<1231:TATCFS>2.3.CO;2.

Smith, S.R., and H.E. Ngodock. 2008. Cycling the Representer Method for 4D-variational data assimilation with the Navy Coastal Ocean Model. Ocean Modelling 24:92–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.05.008.

Stelling, G.S. 1996. A non-hydrostatic flow model in Cartesian coordinates. Technical Note Z0901-10, WL | Delft Hydraulics, The Netherlands.

Tolman, H.L. 2009. User manual and system documentation of WAVEWATCH III™ version 3.14. NOAA/NWS/NCEP/MMAB Technical Note 276, 194 pp. US National Hurricane Center. 2010. Tropical cyclone report, Hurricane Ike (AL092008) September 1–14, 2008, January 2009; updated May 2010.

Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.