The White House budget proposal for FY2018 (OMB, 2017) includes substantial cuts to scientific research programs. Whether Congress enacts those proposals remains to be seen, but even if current funding levels remain intact, ocean (and other) scientists already believe that research funding is tight. Are those perceptions about tight funding really true, or are we are imagining a rosy past that didn’t really exist? Let’s see what the data say.

Mix, A.C. 2017. Follow the money. Oceanography 30(2):7–9, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2017.202.

Bloch, E. 1985. Science policy and tight budgets. Science 227:991–992, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.227.4690.991.
1. NRC (National Research Council). 2015. Sea Change: 2015–2025 Decadal Survey of Ocean Sciences. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 98 pp., https://doi.org/10.17226/21655.
2. OMB (Office of Management and Budget). 2017. Budget of the U.S. Government: A New Foundation for American Greatness, Fiscal Year 2018. Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC, 52 pp., https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/budget/fy2018/budget.pdf.

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.