Recent work on the potential economic value of improved coastal ocean observing capabilities suggests that aggregate values of better ocean observing system information for all US waters could be in the hundreds of millions of dollars per year. This aggregate value derives from specific information delivered to particular user groups in particular regions; the scale of benefits depends on the economic importance of the user sectors and on their ability to make use of better information about local and regional marine conditions. As we continue to refine these estimates of economic value, information on benefits is becoming sufficiently specific to be useful in the observing system design process. This paper describes a National Oceanographic Partnership Program study on the economics of ocean observing system information, presents a framework for incorporating economic information into observing system design, and sketches the beginning of an application of this process to the northeast region of the United States.

Kite-Powell, H.L. 2009. Economic considerations in the design of ocean observing systems. Oceanography 22(2):44–49, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.37.

Adams, R., M. Brown, C. Colgan, N. Flemming, H. Kite-Powell, B. McCarl, J. Mjelde, A. Solow, T. Teisberg, and R. Weiher. 2000. The Economics of Sustained Ocean Observation: Benefits and Rationale for Public Funding. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Office of Naval Research, Washington, DC. Available online at: http://www.publicaffairs.noaa.gov/worldsummit/pdfs/isoos.pdf (accessed April 25, 2009).
1. Dumas, C.F., and J.C. Whitehead. 2008. The potential economic benefits of coastal ocean observing systems: The southeast Atlantic region. Coastal Management Journal 36(2):146–164. [CrossRef]
2. Jin, D., and P. Hoagland. 2008. The value of harmful algal bloom predictions to the shellfish fishery in the Gulf of Maine. Harmful Algae 7(6):772–781. [CrossRef]
3. Kaiser, M.J., and A.G. Pulsipher. 2007. The impact of weather and ocean forecasting on hydrocarbon production and pollution management in the Gulf of Mexico. Energy Policy 35(2):966–983. [CrossRef]
4. Kite-Powell, H.L. 2007. Economic return to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts from investment in ocean observing systems. Background paper prepared for the John Adams Innovation Institute, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Marine Policy Center, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA.
5. Kite-Powell, H.L., C.S. Colgan, and R. Weiher. 2008. Estimating the economic benefits of regional ocean observing systems. Coastal Management 36(2):125–145. [CrossRef]
6. Kite-Powell, H.L., C.S. Colgan, K.F. Wellman, T. Pelsoci, K. Wieand, L. Pendleton, M.J. Kaiser, A.G. Pulsipher, and M. Luger. 2005. Estimating the Economic Benefits of Regional Ocean Observing Systems. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Technical Report WHOI-2005-03, Woods Hole, MA.
7. O’Donnell, J., D. Ullman, M. Spaulding, E. Howlett, T. Fake, P. Hall, T. Isaji, C. Edwards, E. Anderson, T. McClay, and others. 2005. Integration of Coastal Ocean Dynamics Application Radar (CODAR) and Short-Term Predictive System (STPS) surface currents into the Search and Rescue Optimal Planning System (SAROPS). US Coast Guard Report CG-D-01-2006.
8. Pendleton, L. 2008. The economics of using ocean observing systems to improve beach closure policy. Coastal Management Journal 36(2):165–178. [CrossRef]
9. Richert, E., P. Bodgen, and J. Quintrell. 2008. The costs and user profile of a coastal ocean observing system serving a marginal sea. Coastal Management Journal 36(2):179–192. [CrossRef]
10. Wellman, K.F., and M. Hartley. 2008. Potential benefits of coastal ocean observing systems to Alaskan commercial fisheries. Coastal Management Journal 36(2):193–207. [CrossRef]
11. Wieand, K. 2008. A Bayesian methodology for estimating the impacts of improved coastal ocean information on the marine recreational fishing industry. Coastal Management Journal 36(2):208–223. [CrossRef]

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.