Although many oceanographic data products are now considered operational, continued dialogue between data producers and their user communities is still needed. The fisheries and environmental science communities have often been criticized for their lack of multidisciplinarity, and it is not clear whether recent developments in operational oceanographic products are addressing these needs. The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Working Group on Operational Oceanographic products for Fisheries and Environment (WGOOFE) identified a potential mismatch between user requirements and the perception of requirements by the providers. Through a questionnaire (98 respondents), WGOOFE identified some of these issues. Although products of physical variables were in higher demand, several biological parameters scored in the top 10 rankings. Users placed specific focus on historic time series products with monthly or annual resolution and updating on similar time scales. A significant percentage requested access to numerical data rather than graphical output. While the outcomes of this survey challenge our views of operational oceanography, several initiatives are already attempting to close the gap between user requirements and products available.

Berx, B., M. Dickey-Collas, M.D. Skogen, Y.-H. De Roeck, H. Klein, R. Barciela, R.M. Forster, E. Dombrowsky, M. Huret, M. Payne, Y. Sagarminaga, and C. Schrum. 2011. Does operational oceanography address the needs of fisheries and applied environmental scientists? Oceanography 24(1):166–171, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2011.14.

Bahurel, P., F. Adragna, M.J. Bell, F. Jacq, J.A. Johannessen, P.-Y. Le Traon, N. Pinardi, and J. She. 2009. Ocean Monitoring and Forecasting Core Services: The European MyOcean Example. Paper presented at OceanObs ‘09 Ocean Information for Society: Sustaining the Benefits, Realizing the Potential, September 21–25, 2009, Venice, Italy.

Bell, M.J., M. Lefèbvre, P.-Y. Le Traon, N. Smith, and K. Wilmer-Becker. 2009. GODAE: The Global Ocean Data Assimilation Experiment. Oceanography 22(3):14–21. [pdf]

Blower, J.D., S.C. Hankin, R. Keeley, S. Pouliquen, J. de la Beaujardière, E. Vanden Berghe, G. Reed, F. Blanc, M.C. Gregg, J. Fredericks, and D. Snowden. 2009. Ocean data dissemination: New challenges for data integration. Plenary talk at OceanObs ‘09 Ocean Information for Society: Sustaining the Benefits, Realizing the Potential, September 21–25, 2009, Venice, Italy.

Brasseur, P., N. Gruber, R. Barciela, K. Brander, M. Doron, A. El Moussaoui, A.J. Hobday, M. Huret, A.-S. Kremeur, P. Lehodey, and others. 2009. Integrating biogeochemistry and ecology into ocean data assimilation systems. Oceanography 22(3):206–215. [pdf]

ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea). 2009. Report of the Working Group on Operational Oceanographic Products for Fisheries and Environment (WGOOFE). ICES CM 2009/OCC:03, 17 pp.

IOC (Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission). 2008. SCOR/IODE Workshop on Data Publishing, Oostende, Belgium, June 17–19, 2008. IOC Workshop Report No. 207, UNESCO Paris, 23 pp.

Kjell, G. 2003. Better integration of environmental and fisheries science for management advice. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56(3–4):411–413. [CrossRef]

Nowlin, W.D., and T.C. Malone. 2003. Research and GOOS. Marine Technology Society Journal 37:42–46. [CrossRef]

Lamb, R., and E. Davidson. 2002. Social scientists: Managing identity in socio-technical networks. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 7–10, 2002, Big Island, HI. [CrossRef]

Olsen, D.B. 1988. Multidisciplinary issues in marine science. Oceanography 1(2):42–43. [pdf]

Polfeldt, T. 2006. Making environment statistics useful: A Third World perspective. Environmetrics 17:219–226. [CrossRef]

Pontecorvo, G. 2003. Insularity of scientific disciplines and uncertainty about supply: The two keys to the failure of fisheries management. Marine Policy 27(1):69–73. [CrossRef]

Sissenwine, M., and S. Murawski. 2004. Moving beyond “intelligent tinkering”: Advancing an ecosystem approach to fisheries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 274:291–295.

Sokal, R., and F. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W.H. Freman and Company, New York, NY, 880 pp.

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.