Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 27 Issue 02

View Issue TOC
Volume 27, No. 2
Pages 201 - 207

OpenAccess

Career Choices in Marine and Environmental Sciences: Navigating a Sea of Options

By Daniela Böttjer , Sean P. Jungbluth , Rene Boiteau , Brian Burkhardt , Fabio de Leo , and Barbara C. Bruno  
Jump to
Article Abstract Citation References Copyright & Usage
Article Abstract

The world of science continues to train and grant degrees to an abundance of eager young investigators, yet the number of tenure-track positions in oceanography and related fields is not increasing. Nevertheless, academic institutions and scientific research programs still largely emphasize academic careers for PhD recipients. Rarely do graduate programs explicitly provide information on, or preparation for, careers outside of the university setting. Here, we describe a series of four workshops on careers and networking that were organized and led by graduate students and postdocs from the Center for Microbial Oceanography: Research and Education (C-MORE). This grassroots effort allowed young scientists to sculpt and organize the information and training sought by their peers. As these efforts were highly successful, we recommend that graduate students at other academic institutions consider using this approach.

Citation

Böttjer, D., S.P. Jungbluth, R. Boiteau, B. Burkhardt, F. de Leo, and B.C. Bruno. 2014. Career choices in marine and environmental sciences: Navigating a sea of options. Oceanography 27(2):201–207, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.35.

References
    Bruno, B.C., J. Padilla-Gamiño, and F. De Leo. 2013. C-MORE Professional Development Training Program for graduate students and post-doctoral researchers. The Earth Scientist XXIX (3):11–15.
  1. C-MORE. 2013. C-MORE EDventures. Available online at: http://cmore.soest.hawaii.edu/education/edventures.htm (accessed March 31, 2014).
  2. Cyranoski, D., N. Gilbert, H. Ledford, A. Nayar, and M. Yahia. 2011. The PhD factory. Nature 472:276–279, https://doi.org/10.1038/472276a.
  3. Fix the PhD. 2011. Nature 472:259–260, https://doi.org/10.1038/472259b.
  4. NSF (National Science Foundation). 2009. Survey of Earned Doctorates. See: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf11305 (accessed April 14, 2014).
  5. NSF. 2014. The NSF Mission. Available online at: https://www.nsf.gov/nsf/nsfpubs/straplan/mission.htm (accessed March 31, 2014).
  6. Russo, G. 2010. For love and money. Nature 465:1,104–1,107, https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7301-1104a.
  7. Russo, G. 2011. Aspirations and anxieties. Nature 475:533–535, https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7357-533a.
  8. Sauermann, H., and M. Roach. 2012. Science PhD career preferences: Levels, changes, and advisory encouragement. Plos ONE 7(5):e36307, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036307.
  9. Taylor, M. 2011. Reform the PhD system or close it down. Nature 472:261, https://doi.org/10.1038/472261a.
Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.