Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 29 Issue 01

View Issue TOC
Volume 29, No. 1
Pages 60 - 66

OpenAccess

Broadening the Impact of Graduate Education in the Ocean Sciences

By Cheryl Peach  and Gail Scowcroft 
Jump to
Article Abstract Citation References Copyright & Usage
Article Abstract

Ocean sciences graduate students are embarking on an increasingly wide array of career pathways that require teaching and/or communication skills. Traditional graduate training currently does not provide many opportunities for students to gain these skills. Graduate education in ocean sciences should evolve to prepare students with not only research expertise, but also the broader skill set essential for success as a twenty-first century ocean scientist. Within academia, increased competition for limited positions is driving an expectation that competitive candidates will have demonstrated teaching experience or training. Outside of academia, communication and outreach skills are required for collaborating with nonscientists within industry or government, reaching out to stakeholders, and addressing policymakers. Creating graduate programs that effectively integrate research training with teaching and development of communications skills helps graduates compete in an evolving job market. Fortunately, much of the foundation for expanding graduate programs has been established through long-term, targeted investments by the National Science Foundation and other US federal agencies. Leveraging these investments, taking strategic actions at graduate training institutions, and collaborating across activities within the ocean sciences community can support a more multifaceted, integrated graduate education, providing the research, teaching, and communication skills necessary for meeting today’s challenges. 

Citation

Peach, C., and G. Scowcroft. 2016. Broadening the impact of graduate education in the ocean sciences. Oceanography 29(1):60–66, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2016.14.

References
    Abt Associates, Inc. 2010. Evaluation of the National Science Foundation’s GK–12 Program Summary Report. Abt Associates Inc., 16 pp., http://abtassociates.com/AbtAssociates/files/​48/48d14f33-5a92-42ef-b2ba-58dde2f93180.pdf.
  1. Adams, K.A. 2002. What Colleges and Universities Want in New Faculty. Preparing Future Faculty Occasional Paper Series, Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC, 25 pp., http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED472499.
  2. Bouwma-Gearhart, J., S. Millar, S. Barger, and M. Connolly. 2007. Doctoral and Postdoctoral STEM Teaching-Related Professional Development: Effects on Training and Early Career Periods. WCER Working Paper No. 2007-8, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 33 pp., http://www.cirtl.net/files/Bouwma-Gearhart_Doctoral and Postdoctoral STEM_2007.pdf.
  3. Bowden, R. 2011. PhD students: How to improve your communication skills—and why you should. Naturejobs, March 16, 2011, http://blogs.nature.com/naturejobs/2011/03/16/phd-students-how-to-improve-your-communication-skills-and-why-you-should.
  4. DeCharon, A., L. Duguay, J. McDonnell, C. Peach, C. Companion, C. Herren, P. Harcourt, T. Repa, C. Ferraro, P. Kwon, and others. 2013. Concept mapping workshops: Helping ocean scientists represent and communicate science. Oceanography 26(1):98–105, https://doi.org/​10.5670/oceanog.2013.08.
  5. Franks, S.R., C. Peach, J. McDonnell, A. Thorrold, and E. Simms. 2006. EPO—Education and Public Outreach: A Guide for Scientists. The Oceanographic Society, Rockville, MD, 8 pp., http://www.tos.org/epo_guide/epo_guide.pdf.
  6. Goeghegan-Quinn, M., E. Fast, K. Jones, and M. Damanaki. 2013. Galway Statement on Atlantic Ocean Cooperation. 2 pp., http://www.coopeus.eu/galway-statement.
  7. Handelsman, J. 2015. Match training to job trends. InSTEM education: To build a scientist. Nature 523:371–373, https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7560-371a. 
  8. Hopper Brill, C. 2016. Out of the tower and into the classroom or how classroom partnerships give marine science grad students an edge. Oceanography 29(1):68–69, https://doi.org/​10.5670/oceanog.2016.16. 
  9. Kober, N. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 256 pp.
  10. Love Stowell, S.M., A.C. Churchill, A.K. Hund, K.C. Kelsey, M.D. Redmond, S.A. Seiter, and N.N. Barger. 2015. Transforming graduate training in STEM education. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 96:317–323, https://doi.org/​10.1890/0012-9623-96.2.317.
  11. Meizlish, D., and M. Kaplan. 2008. Valuing and evaluating teaching in academic hiring: A multidisciplinary, cross-institutional study. The Journal of Higher Education 79:489–512.
  12. National Science Board. 2011. National Science Foundation’s Merit Review Criteria: Review and Revisions. 310 pp., http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2011/nsb1211.pdf.
  13. National Research Council. 2012a. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Committee on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, S.R. Singer, N.R. Nielsen, and H.A. Schweingruber, eds, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 282 pp., https://doi.org/10.17226/13362.
  14. National Research Council. 2012b. A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K–12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, The National Academies Press Washington, DC, 400 pp., https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.
  15. National Science Foundation. 2014. Investing in Science, Engineering, and Education for the Nation’s Future. Strategic Plan FY 2014–2018. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2014/nsf14043/nsf14043.pdf.
  16. NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 534 pp., https://doi.org/10.17226/18290.
  17. Ocean Research Advisory Panel. 2013. Leveraging Ocean Science Education Opportunities: A Report to the National Ocean Council. National Ocean Partnership Program, Washington, DC, 41 pp., http://www.nopp.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Leveraging-Ocean-Education-Opportunities.pdf.
  18. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2012. Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Report to the President, 130 pp., https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_feb.pdf.
  19. Reis, R. 2000. How to get all-important teaching experience. Chronicle of Higher Education, July 21, 2000, http://chronicle.com/article/How-To-Get-All-Important-Te/46358.
  20. Scowcroft, G., P. Tuddenham, and R. Pizziconi. 2015. Global Ocean Science Education Workshop, June 26–27, 2015: Workshop Report. College of Exploration, Sterling, VA, 37 pp., http://www.coexploration.org/gose/pdf/2015/GOSE_Workshop_Report_FINAL_Distribution.pdf.
  21. SERC (Science Education Resource Center). 2015 About this Project. http://serc.carleton.edu/serc/about/index.html.
  22. Seymour, E., and N. Hewitt. 1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 444 pp. 
  23. Smaglik, P. 2010. Getting better at biotech. Nature 464:1,394–1,395, https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7293-1394a.
  24. Stoll, K., and S. Ortega, eds. 2013. The Power of Partnerships: A Guide from the NSF Graduate STEM Fellows in K–12 Education (GK–12) Program. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 169 pp. 
  25. Strang, C., R. Dorph, and C. Halversen. 2005. Communicating ocean sciences: A course that improves education & public outreach. OCEANS, 2005. Proceedings of Marine Technical Society/IEEE 3:2,642–2,646, https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2005.1640171.
  26. US Commission on Ocean Policy. 2004. An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century. Washington, DC, http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/oceancommission/documents/full_color_rpt/000_ocean_full_report.pdf.
  27. Waldrop, M.M. 2015. Why we are teaching science wrong, and how to make it right. Nature 523:272–274, https://doi.org/​10.1038/523272a.
Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.