Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 26 Issue 03

View Issue TOC
Volume 26, No. 3
Pages 85 - 87

OpenAccess

Below the Salt Marsh Surface: Visualization of Plant Roots by Computer-Aided Tomography

By Linda K. Blum  and Earl Davey  
Jump to
Citation References Copyright & Usage
First Paragraph

As sea level rises, salt marshes become subtidal mudflats unless soil surface accretion occurs at rates fast enough to keep the marsh from being submerged (Brinson et al., 1995). The individual processes contributing to accretion are well known but vary geographically in their relative importance. While the complicated interactions among accretion processes are poorly understood (Murray et al., 2008), production of roots and rhizomes is critical to maintenance of salt marsh soil structural integrity and marsh-surface elevation. Many long-term coastal research programs seek to understand how these interactions influence accretion to more accurately predict salt marsh response to sea level rise under widely differing rates of relative sea level rise, tide ranges, sediment supplies, nutrient inputs, coastal geomorphology, and climate.

Citation

Blum, L.K., and E. Davey. 2013. Below the salt marsh surface: Visualization of plant roots by computer-aided tomography. Oceanography 26(3):85–87, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2013.49.

References
    Blum, L.K. 1993. Spartina alterniflora root dynamics in a Virginia marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series 102:169–178.
  1. Brinson, M.M., R.R. Christian, and L.K. Blum. 1995. Multiple states in the sea-level induced transition from terrestrial forest to estuary. Estuaries 18:648–659, https://doi.org/​10.2307/1352383.
  2. Chmura, G. 2011. What do we need to assess the sustainability of the tidal marsh carbon sink? Ocean and Coastal Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.09.006.
  3. Darby, F.A., and R.E. Turner 2008. Below- and aboveground Spartina alterniflora production in a Louisiana salt marsh. Estuaries and Coasts 31:223–231, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-007-9014-7.
  4. Davey, E., C. Wigand, R. Johnson, K. Sundberg, J. Morris, and C.T. Roman. 2011. Use of computed tomography imaging for quantifying coarse roots, rhizomes, peat, and particle densities in marsh soils. Ecological Applications 21:2,156–2,171.
  5. Deegan, L.A., D.S. Johnson, R.S. Warren, B.J. Peterson, J.W. Fleeger, S. Fagherazzi, and W.M. Wollheim. 2012. Coastal eutrophication as a driver of salt marsh loss. Nature 490:388–392, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11533.
  6. Good, R.E., N.F. Good, and B.R. Frasco. 1982. A review of primary production and decomposition dynamics of the belowground marsh component. Pp. 139–157 in Estuarine Comparisons. V.S. Kennedy, ed., Academic Press, New York, NY.
  7. Morris, J.T., K. Sundberg, and C.S. Hopkinson. 2013. Salt marsh primary production and its responses to relative sea level and nutrients in estuaries at Plum Island, Massachusetts, and North Inlet, South Carolina, USA. Oceanography 26(3):78–84, https://doi.org/​10.5670/oceanog.2013.48.
  8. Murray, A.B., M.A.F. Knaapen, M. Tal, and M.L. Kirwan. 2008. Biomorphodynamics: Physical-biological feedbacks that shape landscapes. Water Resources Research 44, W11301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006410.
  9. Niering, W.A., and R.S. Warren. 1980. Vegetation patterns and processes in New England salt marshes. BioScience 30:301–307.
  10. Nyman, J.A., R.D. Delaune, H.H. Roberts, and W.H. Patrick. 1993. Relationship between vegetation and soil formation in a rapidly submerging coastal marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series 96:269–279.
  11. Schubauer, J.P., and C.S. Hopkinson. 1984. Above- and belowground emergent macrophyte production and turnover in a coastal marsh ecosystem, Georgia. Limnology and Oceanography 29:1,052–1,065.
Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.