Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 37 Issue 1

View Issue TOC
Volume 37, No. 1
Pages 134 - 135

OpenAccess

SPOTLIGHT • Advancing Stormwater Management at Great Lakes Marinas with Green Infrastructure: Outreach, Implementation, and Applied Research

By Scott Hardy , Sarah Orlando, Ryan Winston, Kathleen Fast, Jay Dorsey, and Julia Noordyk 
Jump to
Full text Citation References Copyright & Usage
Full Text

Introduction

One-third of recreational boats in the United States are located at marinas in the Great Lakes (USACE, 2008). Though these marinas depend on a healthy coastal environment, many of them carry out boat maintenance and repair that generate oils and greases, heavy metals (particularly copper, a major component of boat paint), sediment, and nutrients that can be mobilized by stormwater and directly conveyed to nearshore waters (Jessop and Turner, 2011). Given projections of increased precipitation and runoff for the Great Lakes region (Byun et al., 2019), marinas serve as a “last chance” opportunity to reduce stormwater volumes, peak flow rates, and pollutant concentrations. Here, we discuss how improved design and retrofits to existing marinas can mitigate runoff pollution (McAllister et al., 1996).

Green infrastructure (GI) practices such as bioretention, constructed treatment wetlands (human-made versions of natural wetlands that are also called “constructed wetlands”), and permeable pavements can improve aesthetics (Tzoulas et al., 2007), public perception of stormwater management (Keeley et al., 2013), and pollution treatment (Clary et al., 2020). However, GI practices have not been evaluated for treatment of marina-​specific pollution, nor is there sufficient guidance on the design and implementation of GI in marina settings (McMahon, 1989).

To improve stormwater management, four Great Lakes coastal marinas in Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin partnered with their respective Sea Grant programs to implement GI. This collaborative project involved educational, outreach, and applied research components to connect with coastal communities and study the impacts of GI implementation at marinas.

 

Methodology

Clean Marina Stormwater Toolkit

The Great Lakes Clean Marina Network (GLCMN), a regional forum of marina and boatyard stakeholders, was leveraged to increase awareness of GI at marinas through educational workshops and incorporation of GI practices into Clean Marina certification guidance documents. One component of this project was development of the Clean Marina Stormwater Toolkit (https://www.michiganseagrant.org/great-lakes-clean-marina/publications-and-resources/clean-marina-stormwater-toolkit/). The Toolkit includes a decision support tool (DST), an interactive virtual reality model depicting GI practices at a marina, and a list of GI contractors operating in the Great Lakes area that can answer questions about installation and maintenance. The website also lists other educational resources on GI as well as stormwater best management practices.

As the cornerstone of the Toolkit, the DST was created to assist marina operators in determining which GI practices are most suitable for their sites. It was developed based on feedback from a marina stakeholder survey distributed to state project managers; marina owners and operators, boaters, and practitioners who attended clean marina workshops; site visits; conferences; and at a GLCMN webcast meeting. Data were then integrated to build a simplified decision table that includes information about ideal placement, maintenance needs, marina-specific benefits, and approximate installation costs.

Green Infrastructure Implementation and Applied Research

Sea Grant outreach staff approached marinas based on their potential interest in GI implementation, involvement in the Sea Grant Clean Marina program, and onsite technical feasibility of construction. Four marinas were selected along Lakes Superior, Michigan, and Erie due to their enthusiasm for the project, commitment to allowing GI performance monitoring, and capacity to maintain installed practices. Site-specific engineering designs were developed that accounted for marina preferences, ease of installation, functionality, monitoring, long-term maintenance, and typical characteristics of marinas, including high water tables. A treatment wetland, four bioretention cells, and a high rate biofiltration system were constructed, distributed among the four marinas (Table 1, Figure 1). After construction, each practice was monitored to determine its impact on stormwater volumes, peak flow rates, and loading rates of metals, nutrients, and sediment.

 

TABLE 1. Design characteristics of green infrastructure practices constructed at Great Lakes marinas. > High res table

 

FIGURE 1. Map and pictures of green infrastructure constructed at Great Lakes marinas. > High res figure

 

Project Results and Future Work

Partnering with marinas resulted in greater awareness of the opportunities to improve stormwater management in Great Lakes communities. Outreach materials (e.g., fact sheets, posters, and trifold panels) were developed for each GI installation for distribution to marina stakeholders; placement on Sea Grant, GLCMN, and national Clean Marina Initiative websites; and inclusion in the Clean Marina online classroom. The GI practices also permanently display educational signage explaining the project with QR codes linked to the Toolkit. Each installed practice catches the attention of passersby and marina patrons and serves as a demonstration site for improving marina stormwater management. Monitoring results for each GI practice are included in deliverables and have been developed into manuscripts to further stormwater and coastal management research.

 

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Great Lakes Protection Fund (grant agreement #1183).
Citation

Hardy, S., S. Orlando, R. Winston, K. Fast, J. Dorsey, and J. Noordyk. 2024. Advancing stormwater management at Great Lakes marinas with green infrastructure: Outreach, implementation, and applied research. Oceanography 37(1):134–135, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2024.224.

References

Byun, K., C.M. Chiu, and A.F. Hamlet. 2019. Effects of 21st century climate change on seasonal flow regimes and hydrologic extremes over the Midwest and Great Lakes region of the US. Science of The Total Environment (650):1,261–1,277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.063.

Clary, J., J. Jones, M. Leisenring, P. Hobson, and E. Strecker. 2020. International Stormwater BMP Database: 2020 Summary Statistics. The Water Research Foundation, 102 pp., https://www.waterrf.org/system/files/resource/2020-11/DRPT-4968_0.pdf.

Jessop, A., and A. Turner. 2011. Leaching of Cu and Zn from discarded boat paint particles into tap water and rain water. Chemosphere 83(11):1,575–1,580, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.021.

Keeley, M., A. Koburger, D.P. Dolowitz, D. Medearis, D. Nickel, and W. Shuster. 2013. Perspectives on the use of green infrastructure for stormwater management in Cleveland and Milwaukee. Environmental Management 51(6):1,093–1,108, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0032-x.

McAllister, T., M. Overton, and E. Brill. 1996. Cumulative impact of marinas on estuarine water quality. Environmental Management 20:385–396, https://doi.org/​10.1007/bf01203846.

McMahon, P. 1989. The impact of marinas on water quality. Water Science & Technology 21(2):39–43, https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1989.0025.

Tzoulas, K., K. Korpela, S. Venn, V. Yli-Pelkonen, A. Kaźmierczak, J. Niemela, and P. James. 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning 81(3):167–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.

USACE (United States Army Core of Engineers). 2008. Great Lakes Recreational Boating. Detroit District of the Army Corps of Engineers, 103 pp.

Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.