Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 27 Issue 02

View Issue TOC
Volume 27, No. 2
Pages 94 - 102

OpenAccess

A Forecasting Procedure for Plate Boundary Earthquakes Based on Sequential Data Assimilation

By Takane Hori , Mamoru Hyodo, Ryoko Nakata, Shin’ichi Miyazaki , and Yoshiyuki Kaneda  
Jump to
Article Abstract Citation References Copyright & Usage
Article Abstract

A forecasting procedure is proposed for plate boundary earthquakes in subduction zones. It is based on spatio-temporal variation in slip velocity on the plate interface, which causes interplate earthquakes. Model outputs are not only information about the occurrence of great earthquakes (time, place, and magnitude) but also information about the physical state evolution that causes earthquakes. To overcome the difficulty in forecasting earthquake generation resulting from uncertainty both in the physical model and in the observation data, we introduce a type of sequential data assimilation. In this method, we compare observed crustal deformation data to simulations of several great interplate earthquake generation cycles. We are currently constructing a prototype, applying this forecasting procedure to the Nankai Trough, Southwest Japan, where great interplate earthquakes have occurred and are anticipated.

Citation

Hori, T., M. Hyodo, R. Nakata, S. Miyazaki, and Y. Kaneda. 2014. A forecasting procedure for plate boundary earthquakes based on sequential data assimilation. Oceanography 27(2):94–102, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.44.

References
    Dieterich, J.H. 1979. Modeling of rock friction: Part 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. Journal of Geophysical Research 84:2,161–2,168, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB05p02161.
  1. Fujiwara, T., S. Kodaira, T. No, Y. Kaiho, N. Takahashi, and Y. Kaneda. 2011. The 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake: Displacement reaching the trench axis. Science 334:1,240, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211554.
  2. Geller, R.J. 1997. Earthquake prediction: A critical review. Geophysical Journal International 131:425–450, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb06588.x.
  3. Geller, R.J., D.D. Jackson, Y.Y. Kagan, and F. Mulargia. 1997. Earthquakes cannot be predicted. Science 275:1,616–1,617, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1616.
  4. Hashimoto, C., E. Fukuyama, and M. Matsu’ura. 2013. Physics-based 3-D simulation for earthquake generation cycles at plate interfaces in subduction zones. Pure and Applied Geophysics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00024-013-0716-4.
  5. Hashimoto, C., A. Noda, and M. Matsu’ura. 2012. The MW 9.0 northeast Japan earthquake: Total rupture of a basement asperity. Geophysical Journal International 189:1–5, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05368.x.
  6. Hashimoto, C., A. Noda, T. Sagiya, and M. Matsu’ura. 2009. Interplate seismogenic zones along the Kuril-Japan trench inferred from GPS data inversion. Nature Geoscience 2:141–144, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo421.
  7. Heki, K., S. Miyazaki, and H. Tsuji. 1997. Silent fault slip following an interplate thrust earthquake at the Japan Trench. Nature 386:595–597, https://doi.org/10.1038/386595a0.
  8. Hirose, H., K. Hirahara, F. Kimata, N. Fujii, and S. Miyazaki. 1999. A slow thrust slip event following the two 1996 Hyuganada earthquakes beneath the Bungo Channel, Southwest Japan. Geophysical Research Letters 26:3,237–3,240, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010999.
  9. Hori, T., and S. Miyazaki. 2011. A possible mechanism of M 9 earthquake generation cycles in the area of repeating M 7~8 earthquakes surrounded by aseismic sliding. Earth, Planets, and Space 63:773–777, http://www.terrapub.co.jp/journals/EPS/pdf/2011/6307/63070773.pdf.
  10. Hori, T., S. Miyazaki, M. Hyodo, R. Nakata, and Y. Kaneda. 2013. Earthquake forecasting system based on sequential data assimilation of slip on the plate boundary. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Japan 62:179–189, https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nctam/62/0/62_179/_article.
  11. Hyodo, M., and T. Hori. 2013. Re-examination of possible great interplate earthquake scenarios in the Nankai Trough, southwest Japan, based on recent findings and numerical simulations. Tectonophysics 600:175–186, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.02.038.
  12. Ishibashi, K. 2004. Status of historical seismology in Japan. Annals of Geophysics 47:339–368, https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3305.
  13. Ito, Y., M. Hino, H. Kido, Y. Fujimoto, D. Osada, Y. Inazu, T. Ohta, M. Iinuma, S. Ohzono, M. Miura, and others. 2012. Episodic slow slip events in the Japan subduction zone before the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Tectonophysics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.08.022.
  14. Jordan, T.H. 2006. Earthquake predictability: Brick by brick. Seismological Research Letters 77:3–6, https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.77.1.3.
  15. Kagan, Y.Y. 1997. Are earthquakes predictable? Geophysical Journal International 131:505–525, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb06595.x.
  16. Kaneda, Y. 2010. The advanced ocean floor real time monitoring system for mega thrust earthquakes and tsunamis: Application of DONET and DONET2 data to seismological research and disaster mitigation. MTS/IEEE OCEANS 2010, https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664309.
  17. Kaneda, Y. 2014. DONET: A real-time monitoring system for megathrust earthquakes and tsunamis around southwestern Japan. Oceanography 27(2):103, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.45.
  18. Kato, N. 2008. Numerical simulation of recurrence of asperity rupture in the Sanriku region, northeastern Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research 113, B06302, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005515.
  19. Kato, N., and T.E. Tullis. 2001. A composite rate- and state-dependent law for rock friction. Geophysical Research Letters 28:1,103–1,106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012060.
  20. Kitagawa, G. 1996. Monte Carlo filter and smoother for non-Gaussian nonlinear state space model. Journal of Computational Graphical Statistics 5:1–25.
  21. Kodaira, S., T. Hori, A. Ito, S. Miura, G. Fujie, J.O. Park, T. Baba, H. Sakaguchi, and Y. Kaneda. 2006. A cause of rupture segmentation and synchronization in the Nankai trough revealed by seismic imaging and numerical simulation. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, B09301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004030.
  22. Lapusta, N., J.R. Rice, Y. Ben-Zion, and G. Zheng. 2000. Elastodynamic analysis for slow tectonic loading with spontaneous rupture episodes on faults with rate- and state-dependent friction. Journal of Geophysical Research 105(B10):23,765–23,790, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900250.
  23. Murakami, A., T. Shuku, S. Nishimura, K. Fujisawa, and K. Nakamura. 2012. Data assimilation using the particle filter for identifying the elasto-plastic material properties of geomaterials. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 37:1,642–1,669, https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2125.
  24. Nakata, R., M. Hyodo, and T. Hori. 2012. Numerical simulation of afterslips and slow slip events that occurred in the same area in Hyuga-nada of southwest Japan. Geophysical Journal International 190:1,213–1,220, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05552.x.
  25. Nakatani, M. 2001. Conceptual and physical clarification of rate and state friction: Frictional sliding as a thermally activated rheology. Journal of Geophysical Research 106:13,347–13,380, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900453.
  26. Nanayama, F., K. Satake, R. Furukawa, K. Shimokawa, B.F. Atwater, K. Shigeno, and S. Yamaki. 2003. Unusually large earthquakes inferred from tsunami deposits along the Kuril trench. Nature 424:660–663, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01864.
  27. Nishimura, T., T. Hirasawa, S. Miyazaki, T. Sagiya, T. Tada, S. Miura, and K. Tanaka. 2004. Temporal change of interplate coupling in northeastern Japan during 1995–2002 estimated from continuous GPS observations. Geophysical Journal International 157:901–916.
  28. Noda, H., and N. Lapusta. 2013. Stable creeping fault segments can become destructive as a result of dynamic weakening. Nature 493:518–521, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11703.
  29. Noda, H., M. Nakatani, and T. Hori. 2013. Large nucleation before large earthquakes is sometimes skipped due to cascade-up: Implications from a rate and state simulation of faults with hierarchical asperities. Journal of Geophysical Research 118:2,924–2,952, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50211.
  30. Ohtani, M., K. Hirahara, T. Hori, and M. Hyodo. 2014. Observed change in plate coupling close to the rupture initiation area before the occurrence of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake: Implications from an earthquake cycle model. Geophysical Research Letters 41:1,899–1,906, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058751.
  31. Okada, Y. 1992. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 82:1,018–1,040.
  32. Rice, J.R. 1993. Spatio-temporal complexity of slip on a fault. Journal of Geophysical Research 98:9885-9907, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB00191.
  33. Ruina, A. 1983. Slip instability and state variable friction laws. Journal of Geophysical Research 88:10,359–10,370, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB12p10359.
  34. Rundle, J.B., P.B. Rundle, A. Donnellan, D. Turcotte, R. Shcherbakov, P. Li, B.D. Malamud, L.B. Grant, G.C. Fox, D. McLeod, and others. 2005. A simulation-based approach to forecasting the next great San Francisco earthquake. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:15,363–15,367, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507528102.
  35. Sawai, Y., T. Kamataki, M. Shishikura, H. Nasu, Y. Okamura, K. Satake, K.H. Thomson, D. Masumoto, Y. Fujii, J. Komatsubara, and T.T. Aung. 2009. Aperiodic recurrence of geologically recorded tsunamis during the past 5500 years in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research 114, B01319, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005503.
  36. Suito, H., T. Nishimura, M. Tobita, T. Imakiire, and S. Ozawa. 2011. Interplate fault slip along the Japan Trench before the occurrence of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake as inferred from GPS data. Earth, Planets, and Space 63:615–619, https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.053.
  37. Tullis, T.E., K. Richards-Dinger, M. Barall, J.H. Dieterich, E.H. Field, E.M. Heien, L.H. Kellogg, F.F. Pollitz, J.B. Rundle, M.K. Sachs, and others. 2012. Comparison among observations and earthquake simulator results for the allcal2 California fault model. Seismological Research Letters 83:994–1,006, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220120094.
  38. Werner, M.J., K. Ide, and D. Sornette. 2011. Earthquake forecasting based on data assimilation: Sequential Monte Carlo methods for renewal point processes. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 18:49–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-49-2011.
  39. Wessel, P., and W.H.F. Smith. 1998. New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released. Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union 79:579, https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00426.
  40. Wibberley, C.A.J., G. Yielding, and G. Di Toro. 2008. Recent advances in the understanding of fault zone internal structure: A review. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 299:5–33, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP299.2.
Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.