Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 17 Issue 02

View Issue TOC
Volume 17, No. 2
Pages 60 - 67

OpenAccess

Optical Modeling of Ocean Waters: Is the Case 1 - Case 2 Classification Still Useful?

Curtis D. Mobley Dariusz Stramski W. Paul Bissett Emmanuel Boss
First Paragraph

The classification of ocean waters into “Case 1” and “Case 2” began with Morel and Prieur (1977). They wrote that

…two extreme cases can be identified and separated. Case 1 is that of a concentration of phytoplankton high compared to other particles…. In contrast, the inorganic particles are dominant in case 2.… In both cases dissolved yellow substance is present in variable amounts.… An ideal case 1 would be a pure culture of phytoplankton and an ideal case 2 a suspension of nonliving material with a zero concentration of pigments.

Morel and Prieur emphasized that these ideal cases are not encountered in nature, and they suggested the use of high or low values of the ratio of pigment concentration to scattering coefficient as a basis for discriminating between Case 1 and Case 2 waters. Although no specific values of this ratio were proposed to serve as criteria for classification, their example data suggested that the ratio of chlorophyll a concentration (in mg m-3) to the scattering coefficient at 550 nm (in m-1) in Case 1 waters is greater than 1 and in Case 2 waters is less than 1. Importantly, however, Morel and Prieur also showed data classified as “intermediate waters” with the ratio between about 1 and 2.2.

Citation

Mobley, C.D., D. Stramski, W.P. Bissett, and E. Boss. 2004. Optical modeling of ocean waters: Is the Case 1 - Case 2 classification still useful? Oceanography 17(2):60–67, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2004.48.

Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.