Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society

Early Release

OpenAccess

Observing Marine Heatwaves Using Ocean Gliders to Address Ecosystem Challenges Through a Coordinated National Program

By Jessica A. Benthuysen , Charitha Pattiaratchi, Claire M. Spillman, Pallavi Govekar, Helen Beggs, Hugo Bastos de Oliveira, Arani Chandrapavan, Ming Feng, Alistair J. Hobday, Neil J. Holbrook, Fabrice R.A. Jaine, and Amandine Schaeffer 
Jump to
Full text Citation References Copyright & Usage
Full Text

MARINE HEATWAVES THREATEN MARINE ECOSYSTEMS

As the ocean has warmed, in recent decades marine heatwaves (MHWs) have emerged as a major threat to marine ecosystems and ecosystem services, presenting challenges for management of marine fisheries, aquaculture, tourism, and conservation, including for marine protected areas (MPAs). An MHW is a period of unusually high ocean temperatures, often defined as ocean temperatures that are warmer than 90% of the previous observations for a given time of year. MHWs along Australia’s coastal regions have led to mass coral bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef, damage to kelp forests and seagrass meadows in Western Australia, shifts in species, and fish and invertebrate mortality, all creating pressures on fisheries management (as reviewed in Smith et al., 2023). Understanding how climate change influences ocean extremes and impacts societal and natural values is key for evaluating future risks. Growing concerns around the effects of MHWs on marine industries, food security, ecosystem dynamics, and conservation efforts led to the development of MHW response plans for Tasmania and New South Wales during the summer of 2023/24 (Hobday et al., 2024).

While satellite sea surface temperature (SST) products reveal an MHW’s surface expression, its subsurface structure remains unknown without in situ monitoring. The ability to investigate subsurface properties in near-real time is critical for understanding MHWs’ impacts on vulnerable habitats and species and can support evidence-based decision-making.

 

EVENT BASED SAMPLING: A NATIONAL INITIATIVE

Ocean gliders are agile instruments that can be deployed relatively easily to transmit data in near-real time. Gliders measure a range of subsurface oceanographic variables, including water temperature and salinity, and other data important for characterizing the marine environment, such as chlorophyll fluorescence as an estimate of phytoplankton biomass, and light, which is important for photosynthesis. Since 2007, Australia’s Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) Ocean Gliders Facility has repeatedly conducted routine missions in specific regions around Australia (Pattiaratchi et al., 2017). Since December 2018, when IMOS enabled an Event Based Sampling program, glider missions have rapidly responded to and sampled emerging MHWs over the Australian continental shelf, creating a step change in our capacity to understand the dynamics and impacts of MHWs on marine ecosystems.

Sampling extreme events is challenging, as their occurrence is rare and somewhat unpredictable. A nationally coordinated strategy guides the selection of glider missions to target MHW events during their growth, peak, and decay phases. A national advisory committee composed of experts from universities, government and science institutions, and stakeholders, including marine park managers, meets every one to two months. The committee reviews risk criteria on emerging MHWs (Figure 1), such as current SST observations and seasonal forecasts, to determine how conditions are likely to change (Smith and Spillman, 2024). Based on available evidence, deployment locations are prioritized according to an event’s severity and duration, likely impacts, consequences for decision-makers, and technical feasibility as well as the availability of existing observations and models for analyzing the event.

 

STRATEGIES FOR EVENT BASED SAMPLING

DEPLOYING OCEAN GLIDERS TO MONITOR EXTREME EVENTS

 

DECISION-MAKING CRITERIA

INDICATORS AND PREDICTORS
Is an event developing, such as a marine heatwave based on current ocean temperatures and seasonal predictions?

EVENT TEMPORAL EXTENT
Will a deployment be able to sample the full event?

EVENT SPATIAL EXTENT
Will the event affect a large region and the area of interest?

PHYSICAL PROCESSES
What processes are causing the event and how will observations improve our understanding?

AVAILABLE OBSERVATIONS
What other datasets are being collected and in near-real time?

ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS
What will be the consequences of the event, and will observations improve our understanding?

STAKEHOLDER NEEDS 
Will the observations provide the information required for analysis, assessment, and decision-making?

 

 

DATA DELIVERY FOR IMPACT

NEAR-REAL-TIME DATA STREAMS
Visualizations show the glider’s location and measurements once it has surfaced every several hours. Found at the Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) Ocean Glider Facility.

DISPLAYING DATA WITH OTHER OCEAN OBSERVATIONS
While sampling, the glider’s position is shown with sea surface temperatures, anomalies, and percentiles, which reveal the surface marine heatwave. Found at IMOS OceanCurrent.

ACCESSIBLE DATA
Quality-controlled near-real-time and delayed mode data are available through the Australian Ocean Data Network (AODN) Portal and visualized through the IMOS OceanCurrent’s glider webpage.

SHARING FINDINGS
During an event, glider data visualizations and findings are shared via a national committee with stakeholders and through briefings and in newsletters.

FIGURE 1. The steps are shown here for planning an Event Based Sampling glider mission, deploying a glider, and providing the resulting data to researchers, marine managers, industry, and the broader community. Photo credits: Nick Thake > High res figure

 

Once an emerging MHW has been identified, gliders can be deployed within one to three weeks in most areas around Australia. A glider mission typically lasts for three to four weeks and can be redeployed rapidly if required. Near-real-time data are openly available through the IMOS Australian Ocean Data Network Portal and visualized at the IMOS Ocean Gliders Facility website and the IMOS OceanCurrent glider website, allowing direct access to the latest information on an MHW’s subsurface characteristics. Using their links to different sectors, the multi-partner national committee disseminates the glider mission’s status and findings to stakeholders and data users.

 

REVEALING SUBSURFACE MARINE HEATWAVES

MHWs can span hundreds to thousands of kilometers along the continental shelf and last from weeks to months. Hence, understanding the physical processes that underpin their occurrences, depths, and influence on other biophysical variables is necessary for assessing the risks they pose to marine systems and MPAs, thereby aiding in effective management and conservation. The IMOS Event Based Sampling program has deployed 15 glider missions targeting MHWs, one for a tropical cyclone and one for a cold eddy that occurred post-tropical cyclone (Figure 2a). Since 2019, an additional 11 routine glider missions have sampled MHWs, and they have been instrumental in capturing an MHW generation phase, and 24 missions total have intersected MPAs (Figure 2a).

Repeat glider missions have been conducted off Tasmania, as this region’s long-term warming trend has been associated with long-lasting and intense MHWs (Kajtar et al., 2021). During summer 2022, in response to an MHW off Tasmania’s east coast, a glider mission revealed the vertical extent of extremely warm temperatures (Figure 2c) beyond those observed at the sea surface by satellite remote sensing (Figure 2b). The high salinity signature of warm water (Figure 2d) was indicative of the East Australian Current extension flowing southward through Freycinet Marine Park. A deep chlorophyll maximum was observed from fluorescence measurements (Figure 2e). MHWs can occur in this region due to enhanced and deep poleward movement of heat from an intensified East Australian Current extension or enhanced air-sea heat flux. During the warmest months of the year, near-real-time subsurface data from gliders can be useful for detecting southward shifts in waters that likely influence marine species unable to cope with poleward relocation. A 2019 mission highlighted a larger-scale MHW offshore and cooler coastal waters that created a buffer zone for coastal resources and industries. The findings from these glider missions were communicated to representatives from the seafood industry so they could anticipate MHW conditions and potential impacts on this sector. During winter to spring, MHWs can cause harmful algal blooms, and regular communication with those conducting sampling has enhanced understanding of whether anomalously warm water conditions were causing such events. 

 

FIGURE 2. (a) Australia’s Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) glider missions conducted during marine heatwaves (MHWs) since 2019 around Australia (colored by deployment year; IMOS, 2024a). Marine protected areas are shaded in blue (from the Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database, 2022), and the gray contour marks the 100 m isobath. (b) Maximum sea surface temperature (SST; quality level 4, 5; at buoy-depth and bias-corrected using matchups with buoys; Govekar et al., 2022; IMOS 2024b) is shown off eastern Tasmania during the MHW between January 25, 2022, and February 10, 2022, with blue contours corresponding to areas of the Freycinet Marine Park. During this time, the glider (TasEastCoast20220125) traveled from north to south, providing near-real-time data on (c) ocean temperature, (d) salinity, and (e) chlorophyll fluorescence, among other biophysical variables. Isobaths are contoured every 50 m. The glider sampled waters under MHW conditions, including on January 29, 2022, as displayed on IMOS OceanCurrent. > High res figure

 

Glider missions around the Great Barrier Reef have provided valuable near-real-time subsurface measurements during coral bleaching events. Mission locations were planned in collaboration with researchers enacting coral bleaching response plans and representatives from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. As events unfolded, interpretations of the glider observations were communicated broadly to researchers and government agencies. In some cases, cooler waters were found to be present at depth in reef passages that connect the lagoon to the continental slope, offering corals and other organisms potential refugia from hot surface waters.

 

RESPONDING TO MARINE ECOSYSTEM CHALLENGES

To date, strategic sampling with IMOS glider deployments has captured ocean conditions associated with a diversity of MHWs to support marine research, management, industry, and the broader community. Event Based Sampling missions provided stakeholders with near-real-time subsurface data at high spatial and temporal resolution at critical times for understanding MHW persistence and biological impacts in coastal areas. The missions have offered opportunities to assess the impacts of MHWs on habitats and species while also improving our understanding of the ocean processes that drive their occurrence. They have helped to address the challenge of data scarcity, reducing uncertainties in characterizing these events in the subsurface where observations are limited but crucial for conservation and management decisions. Scientific data generated through these targeted missions have underpinned research advances that will potentially inform policy related to climate change and environmental adaptation (e.g., Hobday et al., 2024).

The integration of glider data with other near-real-time data streams through web platforms (e.g., IMOS OceanCurrent) offers a valuable one-stop source for stakeholders to monitor the development of extreme weather events in their regions of interest and increases public accessibility of available data. Ocean water temperature and salinity data from gliders are currently compared against coarse resolution climatologies, and work is underway to develop glider-derived subsurface climatologies over the continental shelf and improve understanding of subsurface MHWs. Furthermore, ocean glider measurements offer validation of high-resolution satellite observations in coastal areas and can detect fronts, where sharp changes in oceanographic variables occur and regular buoy data at fixed locations are not sufficient.

With projected changes to Australia’s climate, including rising ocean temperatures, increased tropical cyclone intensity, and extreme rainfall events and subsequent outflows, marine extremes are increasingly recognized as high-priority issues. Looking forward, the scope of IMOS Event Based Sampling will be broadened to monitor those extremes along with marine heatwaves and cold spells. Continued efforts will provide insights into how events affect MPAs, supporting assessment of their impacts on the marine environment, including habitat degradation and changes in species distribution and abundance, the food web, and biodiversity. Now, more than ever before, ocean gliders offer a powerful capability for rapid mobilization and near-real-time monitoring to respond to challenges in marine ecosystems and their management.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Glider and SST data were produced as part of Australia’s Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS). IMOS is enabled by the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS). It is operated by a consortium of institutions as an unincorporated joint venture, with the University of Tasmania as lead agent. We thank the IMOS Ocean Gliders Facility team for their contributions to this program. The satellite imagery data were acquired from the Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20 satellites by NOAA, from the MetOp-B satellite by EUMETSAT OSI-SAF, and from the NOAA spacecraft by the Bureau of Meteorology, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Geoscience Australia, and Western Australian Satellite Technology and Applications Consortium. The satellite data were processed by the Bureau of Meteorology to produce the IMOS Multi-sensor L3S SST data.
Citation

Benthuysen, J.A., C. Pattiaratchi, C.M. Spillman, P. Govekar, H. Beggs, H. Bastos de Oliveira, A. Chandrapavan, M. Feng, A.J. Hobday, N.J. Holbrook, F.R.A. Jaine, and A. Schaeffer. 2025. Observing marine heatwaves using ocean gliders to address ecosystem challenges through a coordinated national program. In Frontiers in Ocean Observing. E.S. Kappel, V. Cullen, I.C.A. da Silveira, G. Coward, C. Edwards, P. Heimbach, T. Morris, H. Pillar, M. Roughan, and J. Wilkin, eds, Oceanography 38(Supplement 1), https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2025e101.

References
  1. Govekar, P.D., C. Griffin, and H. Beggs. 2022. Multi-sensor sea surface temperature products from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Remote Sensing 14:3785, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14153785.
  2. Hobday, A.J., C.M. Spillman, J. Allnutt, M.A. Coleman, F. Bailleul, L.K. Blamey, S. Brodie, A. Chandrapavan, J.R. Hartog, D. Maynard, and others. 2024. Forecasting a summer of extremes: Building stakeholder response capacity to marine heatwaves. Oceanography 37(3):42–51, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2024.508.
  3. IMOS (Integrated Marine Observing System). 2024a. IMOS Australian National Facility for Ocean Gliders (ANFOG) – Delayed mode glider deployments, https://portal.aodn.org.au/search?uuid=​c317b0fe-02e8-4ff9-96c9-563fd58e82ac.
  4. IMOS. 2024b. IMOS 6-day Night-time Multi-Sensor L3S gridded multiple-​sensor multiple-swath Australian region skin SST (L3SM-6d), https://portal.aodn.org.au/search?uuid=​e1908591-​b3cf-​42aa-a32f-424322b28165.
  5. Kajtar, J.B., N.J. Holbrook, and V. Hernaman. 2021. A catalogue of marine heatwave metrics and trends for the Australian region. Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science 71(3):284–302, https://doi.org/​10.1071/ES21014.
  6. Pattiaratchi, C., L.M. Woo, P.G. Thomson, K.K. Hong, and D. Stanley. 2017. Ocean glider observations around Australia. Oceanography 30(2):90–91, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2017.226.
  7. Smith, K.E., M.T. Burrows, A.J. Hobday, N.G. King, P.J. Moore, A. Sen Gupta, M.S. Thomsen, T. Wernberg, and D.A. Smale. 2023. Biological impacts of marine heatwaves. Annual Review of Marine Science 15:119–145, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-032122-121437.
  8. Smith, G.A., and C.M. Spillman. 2024. Global ocean surface and subsurface temperature forecast skill over subseasonal to seasonal timescales. Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science 74:ES23020, https://doi.org/10.1071/ES23020.
Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.