Oceanography The Official Magazine of
The Oceanography Society
Volume 27 Issue 04

View Issue TOC
Volume 27, No. 4
Pages 13 - 17

OpenAccess

COMMENTARY • Assessing an Undergraduate Oceanography Curriculum

Bradford S. Barrett William A. Swick Dwight E. Smith Jr.
First Paragraph

Despite being a relative newcomer to the geoscience disciplines, the ocean sciences play an important role in the geosciences: the ocean controls the planet’s energy budget, directly drives or influences all major patterns of weather and climate, shapes the planet’s geologic evolution, and links the planet’s food and nutrient chains. Coupling the ocean’s fundamental importance with an excitement among students to learn about the ocean (Garrison, 2014), a rigorous and well-designed undergraduate degree program in oceanography that engages students in the inquiry-​based learning process (e.g., Hassard, 2005) throughout their undergraduate careers is needed. However, the tools most often used at the undergraduate level, such as lectures, whose delivery is made relatively easy by the utility of Microsoft PowerPoint, and recipe-driven confirmatory exercises, whose outcomes are often known before the task even begins, do a poor job of promoting student retention or independent thinking (Handelsman et al., 2004; Mazur, 2008). Such activities often rate low in promoting critical thinking and can be considered to fall near the bottom of Bloom’s Taxonomy (Bloom et al., 1956; Anderson et al., 2001) or Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (Webb, 1997, 1999). However, inquiry-driven activities, such as assigning think-pair-share questions (Kagan, 1994); asking for critique, evidence, and reasoning of a scientific claim (McNeil and Krajcik, 2008); assigning students to predict, observe, and explain a phenomena (White and Gunstone, 1992); and dispelling student misconceptions (Feller, 2007), fall much higher in critical thinking ratings. These more advanced teaching methods are critical to engaging students in the classroom (Feller and Lotter, 2009) and promote rigorous understanding. At all levels of education, active learning techniques positively impact knowledge retention (National Research Council, 2000).

Citation

Barrett, B.S., W.A. Swick, and D.E. Smith Jr. 2014. Assessing an undergraduate oceanography curriculum. Oceanography 27(4):13–17, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.99.

References

Aaberg, W., C. Thompson, and M. Shaffer. 2013. Exploring insights of an evaluation of a meteorology & oceanography program for training Navy officers. Business and Economic Research 3:163–175, https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v3i1.3322.

Anderson, L., D. Krathwohl, P. Airasian, K. Cruikshank, R. Mayer, P. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M. Wittrock. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc, New York, 3,336 pp.

Barrett, B.S., and J.E. Woods. 2012. Using the amazing atmosphere to foster student learning and interest in meteorology. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 93:315–323, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00020.1.

Bloom, B.S., M.B. Englehart, E.J. Furst, W.H. Hill, and D.R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York.

Brix, H., J.L. Hench, H.L Johnson, T.M. Shaun Johnston, J.A. Polton, M. Roughan, and P. Testor. 2003. An international perspective on graduate education in physical oceanography. Oceanography 16(3):128–133, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2003.43.

Compton, R.H., H.A. Chatterton, G. Hatchell, and F.K. McGrath. 1987. The US Naval Academy’s new yard patrol craft: From concept to delivery. Naval Engineers Journal 99:37–58, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.1987.tb01395.x.

Feller, R.J. 2007. 110 misconceptions about the ocean. Oceanography 20(4):170–173, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2007.22.

Feller, R.J., and C.R. Lotter. 2009. Teaching strategies that hook classroom learners. Oceanography 22(1):234–237, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.28.

Futch, V., and M. McConnell. 2013. Innovation in education: Preparing cadets for a changing Arctic. The Coast Guard Proceedings of the Marine Safe & Security Council, Journal of Safe & Security at Sea 70(Summer 2013):86–88, http://www.uscg.mil/proceedings/archive/2013/Vol70_No2_Sum2013.pdf.

Garrison, T. 2014. The oceanography classroom: Why teach what when? Oceanography 27(1):236–237, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.30.

Handelsman, J., D. Ebert-May, R. Beichner, P. Bruns, A. Chang, R. DeHaan, J. Gentile, S. Lauffer, J. Stewart, S.M. Tilghman, and W.B. Wood. 2004. Scientific teaching. Science 304:521–522, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096022.

Hassard, J. 2005. Assessing Active Science Learning: The Art of Teaching Science. Oxford University Press, New York, 476 pp.

Hess, K. 2006. Exploring Cognitive Demand in Instruction and Assessment. National Center for Assessment, Dover, NH, http://www.nciea.org/publications/DOK_ApplyingWebb_KH08.pdf.

Hess, K., B. Jones, D. Carlock, and J. Walkup. 2009. Cognitive rigor: Blending the strengths of Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge to enhance classroom-level processes. Educational Resources Information Center ERIC Number ED517804, 8 pp., http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED517804.pdf.

Illari, L., J. Marshall, P. Bannon, J. Botella, R. Clark, T. Haine, A. Kumar, S. Lee, K.J. Mackin, G.A. McKilney, and others. 2009. “Weather in a tank”: Exploiting laboratory experiments in the teaching of meteorology, oceanography, and climate. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 90:1,619–1,632, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2658.1.

Kagan, S. 1994. Cooperative Learning. Kagan Cooperative Learning, San Clemente, CA.

Mazur, E. 2008. Farewell, lecture? Science 323:50–51, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168927.

McNeil, K.L., and J.S. Krajcik. 2008. Inquiry and scientific explanations: Helping students use evidence and reasoning. Chapter 11 in Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting. J.A. Luft, R.L. Bell, and J. Gess-Newsome, eds, NSTA Press, Arlington, VA.

National Research Council. 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 224 pp.

Palmer, R., M. Yeary, M. Biggerstaff, P. Chilson, J. Crain, K. Droegemeier, Y. Hong, A. Ryzhkov, T. Schuur, S. Torres, and others. 2009. Weather radar education at the University of Oklahoma: An integrated interdisciplinary approach. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 90:1,277–1,282, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2738.1.

Vassiliev, V.A. 1990. Cohomology of knot spaces. Theory of Singularities and Applications 1:23–69.

Webb, N. 1997. Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments on Mathematics and Science Education. Research Monograph 6, Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC, 39 pp.

Webb, N. 1999. Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four States. Research Monograph 18, Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC, 44 pp.

White, R.T., and R.F. Gunstone. 1992. Probing Understanding. Routledge, Great Britain, 196 pp.

Yuretich, R.F., S.A. Khan, R.M. Leckie, and J.J. Clement. 2001. Active-learning methods to improve student performance and scientific interest in a large introductory oceanography course. Journal of Geoscience Education 49(2):111–119, http://nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/mar01.html.

Copyright & Usage

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to the original content. Images, animations, videos, or other third-party material used in articles are included in the Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If the material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission directly from the license holder to reproduce the material.